June 2015
« Nov    
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 10:49 am

To discern an economic righteousness, apropos to times of opportunity, such as the past couple decades since the known human ecosystems moved to a new world order in a post Cold War era, with the United States of America of its win for Capitalism over Socialism, one seems to be prudent if to a stepping off drum beat to the erudite realms of fallacies.

Times such as we have slipped to since the great global victory of Capitalism over expansionist State Socialism have long been made historical passed epochs with specific new ‘lingua franca’ proffered appropriately of punctuations due as exclamations of apexes and nadirs and so when specifically of bad “economic” theoreticals.

Days like today, as of such a considerate era, raise special intellectual alarm clamoring and to such an extent that a new “Socialism” or “Philosophy of Governance” idiom at least is essential as a new “fallacy” however it might best be named for Posterity.

For discussions to a scientific for economic reasoning about such it may or may not help to try to be analogous to the “block buster” status for the new THE LONE RANGER.  To be authentic and genre sensitive the original THE LONE RANGER was bad television by today’s standards and the new movie which I have yet to see seems by the numbers to have had too high a production budget not too low a performance.  To make this new movie more “successful” and “authentic” the big screen production should have been interrupted by commercials at the most inconvenient moments and for decoder rings from Ovaltine or maybe a dramatic advertisement for Red Ryder bb Guns — it seems the “success” model still can work as Capitalism for the new THE LONE RANGER, and, yet it so that its should already have commercials and that the commercials should have been covered by the production budget of $400 million.  America still has room for heroes despite their land of origins, and, it seems that besides commercial interruptions the new THE LONE RANGER as well likely should have been stopped with “TO BE CONTINUED” at least once and so that children would be encourage to think of earning merit badges freshly before yet seeing if the Ranger could ride more than a hundred yards in one scene.

It may be easier to redress the long historical slights about the Reagan victory of Capitalism over expansionist State Socialism by like knowing that where Paul Krugman and his band of ideologues has said all should look for the “booty” of such as proof of it as a treasured win is actually the place such victory is least likely to show itself in Posterity.

Krugman Democrats have been skewing the general welfare of political discourse by parading more like an entertaining ship of fools than even a successful Pirateer.  There may be a great general need to emphasize the difference between a ship of state - Government Ship (solution) - and privateers, and pirate ships.

The jump point for such distractive economic sophistry of a Krugman Democrat - ‘Krugman School’ - is in the halls yet not as it generally appears.  It is dangerous to walk on any of ‘Krugman School’ planks as the actual depths of the issues are covered in layers and layers of fog - of intellectualized chameleon shiftiness.

The Reagan victory of Capitalism over the march or creep of expansionist State Socialism isn’t to be found where Democrats generally have been saying it must be found if it actually was a “VICTORY” — Citizens of the United States of America have been of liberal barrages to such affect - the ship of State has been said not to be of a great victory for laissez-faire economics by such of a ‘Krugman School’ because it didn’t make the Government of the USA bigger and more Socialistic.

Of the depression about the onset of the planks parading of a ‘Krugman Democrat’ or ‘Krugman School’ there is the emotional intelligence that was ignored or rendered as too inconvenient where it related to market forces and citizen and consumer confidence - of the general ‘Krugman School’ there has been some crack wackiness where Americans have been spooned a trip of a ‘fog’ as if the way to govern after such sacrifice and victory for The Reagan Revolution and Capitalism was to have our messaging become more top down and our politics to a affecting that the way to proceed after a defeat of expansionist State Socialism was to force a conversion to a Socialism at home.

The proof of there having been a victory of a Reagan Revolution over the Cold War and expansionist State Socialism just isn’t to be found where Democrats, however, have been persistently saying it should appear.  A victory for Capitalism and laissez-faire economics - The victory - is discernible but not as a Government victory — Republicans have been asked to prove it actually happened along fallacious lines of sophistry that is troubled in more than a couple ways.  First the Republicans that have regularly been prodded along such depths of ‘Krugman School’ planks haven’t been those of the American victory that was much only possible as by “privateers” - by free market resonance and timely synchronized economic harmonics.

There is so much that is of an economic contrariness and confused historical that a tag here now as “THE KRUGMAN FALLACY” can only be a punctuational exclamation to the effect that America does still have heroes and that the treasuring of such a story and booty has yet quite been of steerage by decoy maps.

The depression drop has been of splashes ranted as irregular and out of order by Republicans while more of the cooking and galley of the Democrats akin to Krugman.  The fallaciousness of much of this is demonstrable in many different satirical methodologies and quite economically so if more specifically about Obamacare however a three legged stool may seem of government niceties.  The ‘Krugman School’ offering didn’t parlay well to the historicals - it may have been their sophistry as biased intellectualisms too much of pining for a success for expansionist State Socialism.  The ‘Krugman School’ “economics” are better to be removed for the sake of clarity from being “economic” “science” and left to the softer “science” of “philosophy of governance” - at least.

For now THE KRUGMAN FALLACY is to be left as yet another good title under which much that I have already written and worked through with public sharing can be well organized, for general consumption later in book form.  This is fitting for the missing intellectual honesty, as to how federalism is a critical market force mostly ignored, and/or covered as jumping off points removed by a suggestion that a great victory over expansionist State Socialism couldn’t have actually occurred as if because since it didn’t make the Federal Government of the United States of American BIGGER and more oppressive than it must not have happened.

In laissez-faire “economics” it figures that markets should become depressed after a great victory if those that long sacrificed and suffered were afterwards suppressed and oppressed as if such victory never actually occurred and so as we have witness been of a politics of a new governance that has suggested that after their victories in the long slog between Capitalism and expansionist State Socialism they were to settle in to home fires kindled and stoked of a pressing need for the United States of America to now “recover” by becoming that which it largely had long been fighting against.

However cute the Obamacare three legged stool may be it is still that the ‘Krugman School’ just recently was pushing a false flag pirating of Romneycare.  I do not know if the ‘Krugman School’ allows there to be any lone hero in its overly intellectualized sophist defense of liberal anti-Capitalism propaganda.  It seems that the only “hero” must be them of say the “Crown” as if of a “The King is never wrong - long live the Prince.”

Economically speaking past the defense of a Krugman fandom fog in philosophy of government discourse to Socialism covered as if “science” in economics we have globally now the free markets still supporting the history that Capitalism did defeat expansionist State Socialism by being a superior “governance” basis of more “general Welfare” social good.

As per Obamacare there is still much intellectual honesty to be unshackled for new and better democratic mashables - there is per Obamacare that these times are of times of a “federalism” new struggle and such that we are living in real time of an era when our markets and economics would have been better and stronger if of an erudition schooled more generally and earlier to how the ‘Krugman School’ “solutions” actually now better argue for a less national rendition to either be more global or more local.

Right a fallaciousness is about!  We are living in real time of an era when our markets and economics would have been better and stronger if of an erudition schooled more generally and earlier to how the ‘Krugman School’ “solutions” actually now better argue for a less national rendition to either be more global or more local.

Right a fallaciousness is about!  The “proffered” so long in defense of Democrats by Paul Krugman, economist, have been wrong in a New Nationalism too, as he too at such for economics, for the Constituted United States, renders by his “theorized” that God is yet forward as under Nation - that Nationalism must trump all global eco-systems in market economics for a economics of a centralized Political identity contrary to the US original markets recipes (in pluralism).

                                                *  *  *


{It seems since THE KRUGMAN FALLACY is a fitting title under which to reorganize many of my past columns of many of these past years workings it is appropriate that I leave my bracketed notations here for Posterity.}

Comments Off