New York City is too global a community and the Ground Zero of The World Trade Towers is too international a meeting place for the new museum of the attacks of 9/11/01 to live as of truth if such still of the lies of the Clintons as truth - at least.

What d’ heck?  Da!  Yes!  The facts jack!  We cannot still endure a false truths of the lies known and unknown of the Democrats polarized partisan politics of the Clintons’ machinations.

New York City is too global a community for any local, of the international, of a mission in curatory, to endear a parity in any interfaith internationality with any such as the soon to open W.T.C. September 11 Memorial 911 Museum to endure as operational.

As world trade is still stifled and suppressed by the economics of politics so gone Green and the politics of partisan cover-ups for the politics of the Clintons these are days forward of a need to expose a party at war with itself — These are days of a civil war afoot in intra-party Democrat vs. Democrat propositions that two contrary histories can yet coexist.

It is important for this discussion to a default Federalism that we express a positive in an affirmative even of a “Da!” to a: Yes! We can, for the sake of digging down to the truths, find a way not to be distracted by Russia and its Putin and to stay a prudent course to fixing the “community” across The United States of the northern continent of the Americas.

It d’ fact o’ Presidency of Obama that he has compromised his own leadership potential from the start by his selfish desire, so expressed, to be particularly to a politics too self centered as a Politics in a personality based presidency.  While ignoring President Putin, as necessary, while digging to truths for a default federalism, we yet can posit that maybe now he is making the same mistake that the first black President of The United States of the northern continent of the Americas did himself make while working to make it all about himself.

President Obama has gotten “community” so wrong!  President Obama worked a “community” so incompatible with his assertions that all change had to be about his he as about himself and always attributable to his “personality”!  Yet, ’tis the “community” so global & international of an operational for a museum at the new W.T.C., forward, that must curate the intra-party strife between words of the Clintons and words of current and future executives.

A d’ problema in the affecting of office of presidency by Barack Hussein Obama is much as how he has been tagged of lacking a philosophy of governance.  In some ways it isn’t too simple to say it ain’t for it ain’t as it a d’ truth it ’tis that like his right hand hasn’t known what his left has been gesticulating.  He may be more of a tenor to contralto base than the Clintons as of a Sopranos basis and while it resonates that federalism is enduring as of a basis in bass & baritones.

A prolegomena to an understanding of the “politics” of the presidential affectings should soundly preface a predicating tonage that though he may have carried some high notes, and even with a mezzo-soprano limited range of Mrs. Clinton (perhaps), that his tune has been flighty and unstable for lacking a foundation in a “community” bass tunage.  He has some been undermined by his said kept “rivals” — yet firstly he is he that though his personality sufficient to “POP” a new messianic beat/word.

As we now try to ignore President Putin it may be best we here too postpone a consideration that it may be for the record of the history of the first black President of The United States of the northern continent of the Americas that he philosophically and religiously lacked a soul - that he Barack Hussein Obama didn’t have “Soul”!

How bad is it that President Obama has gotten “community” so wrong?  As he is of the tail of Baby Boomers and now of the tale of his Presidency is d’ problem he or his times? is d’ problem he did keep his rivals too close and too instrumental in a discord partisan and cacophony of d’ general politics? is a d’ problem for curations that these times are now even more appropriate for a reset (otherwise) to a default federalism?

Da words? Da facts? Da community? An: At whom da Problem da problem? Da Word o’ da Vinci in da Art? Da Problem?

It must endure with any prudent curatory that there is a high justice to consider about the attacks of 9/11 I & 9/11 II and how the Clintons should be tagged.  It must endure that since the attacks of September 11, 2001 did occur after the eight years of the affectings in presidency of the Clintons by their “executive powers” that the “community” so international need field the keyed in the legends of the before even as a gross negligence culpability for the The Clintons may resonate and carry true globally.

It must endure, however, and however unsettling, as even though of intra-party strife to dividing the Democrats as if in civil war, politically, that the “community” need be united to the known and should be known of the The Clintons as of a implication of themselves respecting the attacks of 9/11 specifically because the attacks didn’t happen during their years as Constituted executive Power.

It must endure that the “community” of the W.T.C. and its museum, and all about the other venues of the historical cacophony from Al Qaeda attacks, however successful in brutality albeit yet unsuccessful in Jihad, are of facts of words of the Clintons, and as some such contrary to the code of the Word of the founders as words the Word too of Leonardo da Vinci, that are not endearing as it holds true that that these attacks after their years do implicate them of a culpability, and, too implicate Middle East leaders of the whence when of a shared conscience in their faith they too acquiesced to a imprudent postponement of a rendering of a thought “Justice”!

We are of days now where there seem to be metered a “New Republicans” ready and already of a needed reset otherwise to a default Federalism, and yet still an entrenched “Old Democrats” yet of some new faces stuck when of times too needing a new harmonic more truthful and innocent than that of these not now taggable as “New Democrats”!  President Obama has hung with the Baby Boomer politics of his era!  That President Obama has been as a tail of the Baby Boomer tale in his politics can only some explain he otherwise of seeming lacking “Soul” in his counter productive new nationalisms.

It should endure that the Democrats since 2007, at least, have led either as Clinton Democrats or Obamacrats to far in a bad economic direction and one that has rendered to much suffering by those of its suffrage exercised while marching the beat of a New Deal Austerity in New Nationalism when the times globally were keyed already for a booming otherwise if to a default Federalism renaissance (also in The United States of the northern continent of the Americas.)!

These now are times, so lately, yet of New Republicans already harmonic of a new beat to “POP” a resilient soul of the Soul of the Constitution.  A d’ fence of d’ fault is that we already are ready for an emergent post-Obama reset to default Federalisms.  These are times of the Governors more than the of the The Washington too Nationalistic discordant trenchant — These are times still since a “New Republicans” like dumped the teas where recovery by Republican endearing truths can keep enduring forward in these years of recovery so now long so more accurately told in tales as by the think and work of Republicans as Governors.

But yet where are a “New Democrats”?  A new bi-partisanship will be needed and yet the “Old Democrats” however “Clinton Democrats” or “Obamacrats” have too long persisted in falsities and of a politics so partisan and stinging as if regular only when regular at throwing salt in those wounds they inflicted upon the “Old Republicans” - of those wounds still so much as by lashings and beatings by Democrats at wielding lies, and lies, and more lies?

Da words? Da facts? Da community? An: At whom da Problem da problem? Da Word o’ da Vinci in da Art? Da Problem?

Da!  Yes!  Qui!  It endures however, unknown so broadly, and now as it need be prudently curated that DA FAULT is D’ Democrats’ as devilish in their lies and to their imprudent New Nationalism and Green Agenda in alarmist scares of GLOBAL WARMING - The fault mostly should be to public stocks for d’ Democrats at least for having gone away from default Federalism when such was the RESET that was needed in the economy of the The United States of the northern continent of the Americas, and, and since 2007.

Yes!  Yes, it is too true that the attacks of 9/11, for having occurred after the years the Clintons were the Executive Powers couple’d, endure in ways that shouldn’t endear any to them as such as having happened afterwards does so implicate both them, and some of Islam, whence then of those Clintons’ years, as Middle East leaders.  It is measurable for curation for even the global community of New York City so international at the W.T.C. that the Middle East has been evolving yet in a default Federalism made their own.

Qui!  The economics forward if to un-stifling the Obamanomics, so of economic suppression for the Green Agenda, as too a New Deal Austerity worked in an also unnecessary New Nationalism, that has been in the wrong direction, too for the The United States, and so all these years while so many elsewhere were already harmonic in a renaissance, yet in the other direction to such more as a New Federalism charge/march, now is behooved if to digging deep enough around 9/11 I & 9/11 II to understand the truth that Al Qaeda seems to have succeeded in attacks yet failed in their JIHAD attempts, and maybe because they were of the waiting (to be explained) in the waiting until after the Clintons were no longer in office!

New York City is too global a community and the Ground Zero of The World Trade Towers is too international a meeting place for the new museum of the attacks of 9/11/01 to live as of truth if such still of the lies of the Clintons as truth - at least.

Da words?  Da facts?  Da community?  An: At whom da Problem da problem?  D’ Problem?  D’ Clintons?  D’ Clintons together? R u of d’ problem if u don’t rise as a citizen to ask too of what President William Jefferson Clinton was of thinking and doing (deciding not to do) in 1993 that like so ticked off Osama Bin Laden of a young Al Qaeda

Da Problem? D’ fault is that we of the U.S.A. haven’t too already been of march of a charge in NEW FEDERALISM?

DA!  TOO?  DA?  President Vladimir Putin of the The Russian Federation whom years ago countered President Barack Hussein Obama’s seeming wrong direction to “socialism” with an admonition even patriarchal that if he did persist the The United States of the northern continent of the Americas could well fall apart into six separate more regional due to resurgent Federalism?

The fault seems now to be parsed between whom is more to blame the Clinton Democrats or the Obamacrats however of the embrace of the Clintons and as said “rivals” and as so as if independent of the Clintons while of their economic team of said experts and so too much of a politics that was limited by a need to cover-up for the Clintons and too somehow persist as if a success only as made possible by the personality of President Obama!

To make a robust and due intellectual making an example of Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton as per any feminism and all feminism of a judicial parity for civil discourse there are elements of modernity of her as at a political vessel of at least the past twenty years of things that have proceeded yet without yet being sufficiently deconstructed as if possibly actually “progressive” and if prudent of a yet (moral) “workability.”

What we’ld be behoven and prudent to put to ourselves if to be objective and intellectual to a predicating of the many issues of Mrs. Clinton, however, is now how to separate the women from the women and the women from too yet past invisible hands in guidance and posturing of women - at least.  We need to make examples for a case study of real issues of these past years at political attempts to be more equal in a progressive feminism without yet making a specific example with actually more confusing subjective viscerals embedded.

Men and women - for boys & girls, at least - must now see their times as times to learn how to talk about women - to talk about women as about Mrs. Clinton, however, and too as women: as grandmothers as single, married, and even widowed; as mothers as working girls as single or coupled as coupled in and/or out of marriage union; as mothers young and mothers old; as women as single in traditional and liberated purviews of their rights and decisions; as women yet as girls still looking for answers and workable examples from the women before them - however familial.

It is more that we are not now of a WAR ON WOMEN yet of a new enlightenment supposed as passing from a dark ages about women and to artfully duty called to CELEBRATING  women - celebrating women with specific case detail of an objectivity as prefaced to prudent budge it consecrated.  Men and women alike - especially for the extant Mrs. Clinton @ #Politics - need now to objectify women so we can talk about women without talking about women.

And, it seems we’ld be prudent if to not naively to waiting for Mrs. Clinton to offer her vessel to facilitate a float for the intellectual objectifying for a reasoned robust critical establishment — seems we’ld be prudent to not wait for Mrs. Clinton to offer a leading - to surrender herself objectively to be made a fully deconstructed example of of her “woman.”

How I have pinned a relativity to my past of feminisms yet in a masculine progressive and suggested such was fundamental and instrumental to much for women, and so with recent essay HAIL MARY! - FEMINISMS? @ http://CitizenRosebud.com, we are here yet to also budge an objective case from such that is rightly discussable better if removed of specific subjectives and to a case study of the situational and issuant extant so to objectify women so we can talk enabled about feminism as about women without it about women.

I propose we can quickly dispense with Senator Elizabeth Warren in such talk of women as progressing.  I propose Senator Elizabeth Warren to a too puzzling and of entangled economics nonsense for these purposed of getting to a bottoms up review and deconstruction of modern women. Any discussion of Sen. Warren here would be too much like speaking to a consideration that an imprisoned guilty of a crime is the most electable for the best expert in their area of criminality ‘economics’ but for being so publicly known seemingly in a contradictory.  For she is a good Harvard fellow, like, of an expertise in bankruptcy inequities some it is to confused to proffer a discourse regarding how the reality is that she is of the Democrat Group Think economics that did more to create more work for her speciality as them most responsible for causing the economic & housing crashes specifically.

Yet before we rush at an objectify bottoms up deconstruction of Mrs. Clintons as woman we should sparingly account for some women under woman Clinton as post FLOAR Mrs. Clinton but so beautifully in the richness of controversy of Mrs. Clinton of FLOTUS equality era.  A introduction of Senator Warren would too confuse a case study of woman of Mrs. Clinton for it political too that Warren hasn’t yet ratted on the Clintons for many economics causal to say this “jobless recovery”!  To budge an expedient comprehension of the flaws of feminism we better isolate the woman of Mrs. Clinton since firstly FLOTUS;  to budge such we need to objectify women as unique from Mrs. Clinton but yet of an enabling as if prototypes not off the line in a uniformity to such accountability in a causality too taggable as of Mrs. Clinton’s woman.

It is beautiful the bounty of the vessel Clinton as woman for if to objectivisms by objectifying the problematic still the quantity of her effectings provide a vast and much left wing richness in contrariness to fill out any case study of the feminisms and women of the Union constituted by the People’s Order & it’s amendments at least of the Bill of Rights.  It is beautiful in an objective scientific how full a tree of Clintons’ of women can be even when separated from specific truths and unique guilt otherwise embedded inconveniently if too of a too subjective deconstruction.

So to follow on from the queued up of “HAIL MARY! - FEMINISMS?” at http://CitRB.com and with this as “HOW TO BUDGE IT?” we should gird ourselves to not war on women but to posture to celebrate and yet in a richness objective accounting of women and the feminisms of the past twenty plus years.  To proceed about a deconstruction and review of women, and objectively, we can intellectualize towards a readiness to discuss women not as the women of specific faults but as women of situationals of a thought progress in a workable progressive while yet inventive and as if women so were more as prototypes than of the line of a uniformity already well figured and measured.

How to budge it - though?  How do we deconstruct the vessel woman of the vessel Clinton at least to affect an objective parity between women and women, and women and men?  How do we account for the culpability of women, as of a flawed from association with Mrs. Clinton, and so if and when of a naivete, and ignorance, yet of the real culpability of Mrs.Clinton, however?

I know I can separate the professional woman of my sister as a woman of these feminisms and objectify her and her story as a case of feminism of the issues and experiments of the times, and, know that I nor thee need to make an example of a specific woman yet as it be prudent to take the lead with the known and unknown culpability of Mrs. Clinton, and specifically fully as of the woman and feminisms since William Jefferson Clinton first brought her to that co-holding of the office of the President as the holding by one of them does by the election of one of them bring the other by election so to a also holding of the office.

I for my years of feminisms in a masculine do have enough water under me to discourse here on feminism and of women of my sister’s professional working girl “woman” to nudge and budge this so far and considerately to the said beautiful possible in an attempt scientific to talk about women now without talking about women, specifically - at least about women in a subjective.

What is already broached - of a breached - is some that I can historically relate a albeit late accounting of my own years effective in a voluntary feminism in my masculine as of years of pro-active and reactive affirmative action not limited to sex - to the sexes.  I can further this issuance if we met out a case study objectivity by comparative analogous renditions of years I can relate to as having been in positive efforts so, and too then as if of a control variable for contrast of a proofing from the negative as of negatives of women - but not just women - when the positive is considerable for the negative effective - as so it establishable as considerable much for an invisible past hand can be seen if years are compared as like since when Mrs. Clinton keyed HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT and my striking since.