January 2014
    Feb »
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 6:30 pm

[This piece is original to  6/03/2012]

The important equity figure is near 6 Trillion.  When President Obama took office there was a reported 6 Trillion available but sitting idle in private holdings.  When President Obama took office he may still have not realized how unfair it would be that some made it look far easier for Clintons to be First Couple in administering executively during their 8 than it actually was for those years.

Though there was a reported 6 Trillion of private equity available at the time President Obama took office there was little he could do with it as a new Democrat now to SPEND, SPEND, SPEND & THEN TAX for after the first round of new Dem spending private equity was smart enough to see their mattresses as offering better “return” on investment even if only offering zero return.

Besides it is quite unreasonable and not preposterous or of an injustice to note that the Clintons were made to be better than they were for of a time others were making it be too easy, relatively speaking of the challenges of those years, and seem easier to be a successful President than the work of the Clintons can explain, still.  No it may not be fair to Obama that it was made to look far easier to be President those years than the actual workings for America now will attest.

President Obama did come into office and move from old Dems “TAX AND SPEND” to a more progressive and irresponsible “SPEND, SPEND, SPEND & TAX” loose affiliation with limiting principles and financial prudence.  He did come into office with a reported 6 Trillion in private equity available for investment if a profit could be reasonably and justly expected.  He did come into office where that 6 Trillion was beyond he reach and reasoning as of private wealth.  He is still in an office limited to spending mostly on a basis for revenues from profits or income or capital gains.

Yes, GREAT WALLS can make good neighbors.  Yes fences have also been to expressions that they too make better communities. Yes, President Obama had mattresses offering at zero predicted return more reasonable return than “investing” in an Obama economy - and so while he without “wealth” or “property” taxing that in America is kept to the preserves of much more local governance revenue long arms of collections.  Our federalist system with its different revenue collection methods does act like a fence or wall to defend our confederated republic and enumerated and protected freedoms and rights - and as well a general Welfare in common sense.

Yes, it is reasonable to have at least considered that President elect Obama would have known of Nixon and the lesson most are if in politics supposed to take away about it being the cover-up that should ruin.  But President elect Obama did commence to President Obama with clear efforts that can only best be described as of an attempt to cover-up for the Clintons.

Have you found the missing years 1993 - 2001 yet? 

I don’t remember when the BIG DIG finished in Massachusetts nor when its vast sums of other states people’s money stopped flowing in excessive sums into such state, and, nor do I recall when the DOT COM BUST happened and how it directly effected the tech corridor about Boston and Massachusetts’ economy in general.  These both seem to be big factors of a relevant chronology precedent to Massachusetts having Mitt Romney as a Republican Governor.  For his state to have been at 51st place for job growth I am guessing that I am correct in remembering such preceded his governance.

2012 really is seeming to be a year where people will be wondering again about the Clintons and their 8 years and finally maybe to realizing that they still don’t know how they were successful with many of their sold “successes” and be to relating with such as it seems clearer now that they have failed in attempts to help Dems with President Obama effect a repeat.

Yes, it may be unfair still to President Obama that the Clintons were made to look better than they were and that those difficult years were made to look as if of an easy street of easy governance for our Executive leadership.  Yes, it may be unfair that so many let it be thought that it could be that easy to be President.

Our income and profit based federal revenue system may be all that saved us from this over-reaching initiated by the Clintons and carried further and too far by the Executive governance of Obama.  Our states and localities have the authority to mend and/or maintain their “communities” and “civility” with “wealth” and “property” taxation - the new Dems proceeded with policies that needed “wealth” or “property” taxing power to “redistribution” - the new Dems by trying to do such still with a profits or income or capital gains limited authority did self construct a wall or fence between their ideals and their workability.

It may go down in our future history books that President Obama’s biggest mistake was his work so polarizing and partisan in a political with a capital “P” to attempts to effect a cover-up for the Clintons.

Have you found the missing years 1993 - 2001 yet?

His efforts at job killing have been far stronger than his efforts to job creation and his “save” of GM may have been more about trying to effect a political remaking of such company than a “financial save” of such.

We still have that before he commenced with his GLOBAL WARMING ALARMISM platform to green energy we had as precedence that a similar green energy political push in Spain had cost at least two old economy jobs for each one new “green” job created.  We have that there was precedence to expect that Obama meant to cut more jobs than he planned to create and multiples so for his aggressive politicizing was mixed with an austerity message with a call to a great new conservationism such that Americans should honestly have been warned by President Obama to expect that his furtherance of Dem ideology was set to actually kill off at least three to four jobs for each of the new politically correct green jobs.

We can thank our founders and later geniuses who limited our federal government spending to revenues bases so on profits or income or capital gains.  This doesn’t help President Obama with Dem ideology or actually help  further the attempts to cover-up for the Clintons but it did allow people free economic expression and even a shift if of investment equity to otherwise shift plans to long term development where losses would be planned for next 4 - 8 years but with enough profit to be expected there after if it then seemed safe and/or profitable to be at least so endeaverous within American borders.

But have you found the missing years 1993 - 2001 yet?

Have you also yet considered that a national or federal effort to a new growth economy may do now more harm than good and that Americans now have to find ways closer to home and for a while more with any “redistribution” debate kept to where “wealth” or “property” taxation the revenue basis for community maintenance and civility bolstering?

Yes I do believe the reports that there was near 6 Trillion in private equity sitting available and hungry for rational investing to reasonable returns for risk.  I do believe that Dems some how missed that their ideology and SPEND, SPEND, SPEND & TAX new ways forewarned capitalists to days where their mattresses likely would be a better “investment” and for a while.

They were the good guys and gals and yet well it was that private equity capitalists were supposed to be the bad guys and gals.

I still have no idea how the Dems did expect their “economic” ideas to actually work - it still seems clear that their aggressiveness was meant to cause this very economic condition and its austerity/conservationism.

I still have no idea how the Dems while attempting a cover-up for Clintons did expect any Republican to naively partake in a bi-partisan self destructive politics.

They tried the claiming to themselves as being the HEROES and the job creators of private sector as the VILLAINS.

Our Internal Revenue Service was supposed to get the funding for new massive armies of tax collectors - and yet since our federal revenues are not of a basis from “wealth” or “property” such was as self defeating as so much else of Dems’ ideology.

I still have no idea how Dems did think it would have worked if it could have worked - especially since it seems to be working exactly as it should have worked with so much “political” and “socialistic” injected preposterously and unjustly into and about our economy.

I don’t know about MARX as per “KILL LISTS” his - I did learn a new phrase this morning from Andrew Sullivan seemingly quoting Cardinal Dolan - I did realize this new term and its usage suggest a call to consideration to due process and as of an innocence until a guilt proven.  When you hear “preposterous and unjust” phrase do you first assume guilt or do you suspect a denial of due process or prejudice of a prejudgement maybe as unfair as that which its usage proffered regarding?

As per the Dems misplaced ideology and practice these past few years we have that Dems as a class of subjects can be said to have caused the economic down turn while as an individual suspect President Obama more insulated and isolated though clearly of a willful association. 

A SIT REP now beyond the cover-up problem President Obama has with the rival class in his cabinet inclusive of at least a party to “two-fer” in person of Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton is that which is of his foreign policies of so much denial of due process and soft money redistributing.  But this is punctuated in ways due clear emphasis.

A SIT REP now beyond the cover-up problem President Obama has with the rival class in his cabinet inclusive of at least a party to “two-fer” in person of Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton is as well is an election year oddity especially for the Clintons that had half their supposed Hollywood friends rat them out as “BIG LIARS” and now as with fatality reports regularly still flowing as evidence as failures in a Diplomacy we have a messaging somehow still allowed near:  Hillary lied and lies and soldiers are dying - Wow, what a great job Hillary is doing.

A SIT REP now towards 2012 deciding now must encourage a less Marxist BLIND FAITH in Obama Diplomacy and get around to asking if we were once recently of Senator John Kerry of Massachusetts of regular disloyal assertions to his anti-war revival efforts of an earlier Communist scare so with “Bush lied soldiers died” how long can we now still tolerate the indiscriminate political “diplomacy” so partisan of Madam Secretary of State but as also to a “Hillary lies - more soldiers are dying.”?

How did the Clinton economic team embraced by Obama White House as if it were the expected inevitable return of the Clintons fail?  It can be said that their economic policies should have brought us all just here but that isn’t how they are telling their own stories.  We have that if they could have back in 1993 they would have commenced earlier to this mess - it seem that they by not learning by those easy times that they yet still can hardly well explain do now seem still to fail to understand what was the “successes” of those years.  The Clintons and their “experts” have for years shown an ignorance about their own said successes, oddly.

We have that we could have had this fine mess in their first term if they had managed to have their way then - and so quite so much because our federal revenues are not based on “wealth” or “property” but are responsive to motivations of the People and their willingness to associate and cooperate economically.  We have that the People likely would have gone on strike as well against such Dem “management” back as early as Clintons’ first term if they had managed to have had their way whence then.

Comments Off
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 3:17 pm

[This piece original to  9/14/2013]

First order of business now is healthcare.  Recently there have been reports quite contrary as “new” with the reports of old as per the fundamental thinking and politics of President Obama.  To that President Putin is now at times heckled for punk’in President Obama this may all just be a presser for a coming schooling on how Obamacare, by Putin’s “American”, is actually Un-Constitutional by the First Amendment.

Before we get to where such President can go next - can next punk President Obama per his Socialism - it is most pressing and critical that the first reports from the White House Press Room were not bolstered with a notation that President Obama did just for precautions political have a full mental health examination.  It is that there is a new Obama now fundamentally and elementarily contrary to the old Obama - it seems he may have just changed his mind - not lost it.

To what Stalin may have to do with this:  It seems Stalin did actually tear down a Moscow Cathedral and towards a permanent enshrining of himself with so a less “sanctuary” quality.  As President Vladimir Putin is now fashioned politically fittingly for his times more religiously traditionally it seems it has been he more than President Barack H. Obama that has been lifting and raising up “church” while it President Obama quite to putting them out of business with Obamacare.

The First Amendment of the Constitution that unites the states in a loose federalism workable around the world for most reasonably sized States does stand apart though exceptionally as it for Americans is of a freedom of religion that is not at all a freedom from religion as originally reasoned.  Obamacare fundamentally decimates the First Amendment.

It seems President Obama has been as by ACA coughing up of a rushed most desired tool for a new nationalism has proven himself more as if a Stalinite than as of a Christian “messianic.”  There is existential jurisprudence in the First Amendment that for now is still not yet of the Supreme Court challenges to “Obamacare.”  Essentially the Supreme Court hasn’t yet been asked to rule past “it’s a tax” of a bully power of the Executive and Congress in case of a need to like wage war on health and to rule if such were to be institutionalized as if a permanent new federal Power it then would be essentially and elementarily in real and critical conflict with the First Amendment as an essential structural node of what is Constitutional and “American.”

President Obama cannot have his (Stalinistic) American new New Deal foundation with “Obamacare” as permanent without such being in violation of the pragmatic and essential of the Constitution as affirmed by the Bill of Rights and especially just the First Amendment.  It is a civil procedure jurisdictional conundrum of the enduring affirmed paradigm of freedom from one’s Creator that renders Obamacare a souffle sunken and ruinous — Our national federal government by our Freedom of Religion - not from religions - cannot be to a permanent institutionalization of healthcare (covering) without being violate of the People’s rights and states’ autonomy about “faith” and even the moral pressures subscribed about the seven deadly sins and their important civic imports.  Obamacare is a civil procedures wreck about the US loose federalism foundation for and in morality by the People.  The First Amendment secures to the People a greater right than for Congress in much if not all of an “interpretation” of God’s will.  It is too atheistic how Obamacare seems actually on a road to be “permanent” as if the Congress otherwise is of the authority to interpret and rule over the People and their spirited communities as to what is an establishment of religion - as to the seven deadly sins and their moral imports and all tenets of religion a ministering is to Power of for at least effective local community based unity with peer pressure.

Our exceptional American establishments are still Constitutionally secured as by the recent DOMA and Same Sex Marriage Supreme Court rulings - our Constitution did with these decisions scroll out a deeper understanding of a lacking of standing for Obamacare if as to a permanent new “institutional” as it is that such has with such shown a fundamental and elemental contrariness of the enduring Right being of the states as to the jurisdiction of the seven deadly sins as writ large to be a or the bulwark of communities, not a nationalism.

American exceptionalism may be of a political jeopardy these days as embraced by editorializing by President Vladimir Putin to be illuminative of President Barack Hussein Obama as maybe too Stalinistic or too of a state secular atheism.  Putin may beat Obama to the elementary and fundamental new messianic of the global trends about a new federalism, however American in historical origin, and so too be again able to punk @BarackObama on the world stage about the American First Amendment limitations as bars for the United States of America from Socialism and Stalinism.

Obamacare by way of the politics of President Obama has been to be a threat to religion and the existential and metaphysical community and social securing for communities as by a structured around religious nodes for sanctuary.

As Thomas Paine grew up a “doubting Thomas” necessarily he somehow came to feel destined or too Jobian of a fate to write large and generally about common sense and effectively fundamentally as seated firstly inescapably from a sensical about pain and a danger from ignoring or doubting pain.  President Obama has been quite too idealistic in a escapist high-falutin as he has steamed up and down our rivers of politics.  There are Siren calls for the ship of Obamacare and unlashed Captain President Obama - he is not allowed to permanently institutionalize a federal power to have people of the Peoples’ secured communities of rights from their Creator where a citizen (now “subject” so (reconstituted) but) can visit a doctor - a National system doctor say for a Prozac to over-ride or trump the peer and ministered moral righteous “pressure” of his community and its civic foundations.

Our economics are secured only when fashioned or permitted to still be of the religious sanctuaries as essential and critical nodes of the constituted and consecrated long as enduring and exceptional as “American.”

Obamacare must fall if set now past a taxing right to bully a better way for all forward to a permanent federal institutionalization.  Obamacare is Un-Constitutional for it is violate of the necessary sanctuary for sanctuaries religious by the First Amendment bar of Congress from making any Law that would give it more authority than the People or the states at interpreting the tenets of religion - any establishment of the founders Christian God - any moral community pressure around “sin” and repercussions due of from just peer pressure by way of a “community” enduring constituted under God and the seven deadly sins. 

The Federal Government by the American Constitution doesn’t have the right to trump the states as per the health of those that have decided to call such their home state.  President Obama by the already existent Supreme Court challenges to the unaffordable Affordable Care Act has only a short term power to bully the states for not having like already competed with Massachusett’s and to a state based more moral covering of all their residents as at least by a Romneycare.

It is troubling that Candidate Governor Mitt Romney too missed the essential importance of sanctuaries religious as critical and fundamental nodes for a workable economic for America - it is remembered that Candidate for President Governor Mitt Romney was too to much too of a seeming desire to Un-Consitutionally bully the exceptional American People people.  Mitt Romney deserved to not win the Presidency as soon as he was to promising that he would repeal Obamacare and replace it with Romneycare. 

Romneycare is not a national workable solution either - it is only Constitutionally workable as a state solution. 

And, yes I am still of my reasoned opinion and a faith in it that economically speaking our sanctuaries are fashioned as critical nodes even around healthcare for all morality - that essentially the only just, right & nationally Constitutional “affordable” reformation is to be protestant and regular in practice to an urban and suburban new “community” figuring so as if a Count not a Czar the apropos to a new economics of a COUNTY-WIDE not COUNTRY-WIDE revolutions for healthcare (covering).

Comments Off
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 12:08 pm

[This piece original to 12/20/2011]


For sake of the season let us not this morning parse words - Holiday words too much - let us not get lost about LITTLE PRINCE or “born king.”

We should ease our way this dawn smoothly with due transitions to new and better ways - we should think still about princes, and even a modern Machiavelli - Machiavellian.  Tis the season - ’tis the season again where we have too much charity.

Please, in light of all such charity about, and so many Princes want to bees, or wanna to be King, we do live in a small world - a world where our 99% maybe be like a 1% itself to peoples deep in China or areas near enough - east - northeast - west - and north.  Where is Machiavelli to explain now how to redistribute the “havings” of our 99% as equally to those that fairly, if they only knew - if they only knew enough - that can call themselves of a 99%?

To understand this problema and political diaspora mostly Christian, though, we maybe should look at one not a King too charitable and too willfully of a persistent meddling - one that has involved himself as if only charitable and yet with a very complicate past that touches much on New York State and Arkansas as well.  No I am not talking about compromises of Cuomo, well not specifically here yet - I am not even much talking about a former New York State Senator, a recent carpetbagger who essentially started running for a different and higher office near as soon as swore first to New Yorkers.

We have a puzzle this holiday to frame so many family histories and surround so much yule time conversation, we have a few puzzles all in some way or another pixelating personally with flash cards just for President Clinton.  For the sake of this column we can picture him as a one man North Korean human “computer” “graphic” pixelation with cue cards too “charitable” this season and generally for ours or any “growth economy.”  Sort of like the wonderment from last Olympics opening ceremonies but a one man show - wrong especially for our modern economy and times, here at least.

We could look to a new book that invades New York politics with a  discussion of compromises of Cuomo coverage but yet we are left wondering on just one man, a past President, now too charitable globally, without enough history in Arkansas, Washington, or New York to see that just all local citizen peoples could get a less dependent entitlement about the mostly local commerce good that is healthcare provisioning.

Where is the Prince - where isn’t President Clinton now with his excessive charity - his continued possession of an old power and speciality of our Executive Powers that he should have shed or dropped like an already used cue card - where isn’t President Clinton now with a call to loyalty and continued “relevance” wants for just himself with too much call to charity so and such that he is effectively undermining a “growth economy”?

So we have that Governor Andrew Cuomo gets mentioned in President Clinton’s new book - and yet hardly enough for being a former disciple and devotee that now for New York State is busy, busy, busy, trying to unlearn all his past “Clinton” “expertise.”  So we have that Governor Andrew Cuomo gets mentioned now for being to a different solution and caring for people that President Clinton has had decades and decades his to have already tried to help, especially in Arkansas, and yet, and yet?

Sure “Hillary” may be in the picture some here and maybe more culpable specifically at least as per New York State citizen people whom she earlier could have fought for with a C.C.C.P. of her own - a Compromised Clinton Care Plan - her own, and just for at least six or so separate regions of her new state.

We have that our 99% can be a 1% to others more a 99% compared to them - and yet we have President Clinton still of an extra trillion cut for political popularity to surpluses thought impossible - impossible for being so long thought as maybe too irresponsible - and yet we have a former President personally responsible with just his current attempts to hold as much absolute power as absolutely as possible now more inappropriately to excessive appearances of and committed distributions of his dangerous “charitable” globalized extra-Constitutional initiatives and conceptions.

Is it wrong as well that President Clinton did publish these thoughts constructed into a book?  Has he no real legacy to now be writing of Governor Cuomo now with a c.c.c.p. of his own - a Cuomo compromised coverage plan?  Has he no good place to be as per Governor Cuomo essentially now needing to run the other way from past “expertise” of his past as a “Clinton expert”?

It doesn’t help that with President Clinton trying now to play King and Prince and “unpolitical” spouse to a secretary while so well endowed by tax payers with post office relocation and sustenance accounts that he can self rationalize that he has like been promoted out of and above our Constitutional office of the President - quite while he can daily consider that such must be the “official” line since he got for life basically a rent near 4X his past annual salary.

The C.C.C.P. today that could have earlier been a Clinton caring for those she was a “carpetbagger” pretender with, so willing to walk over her subjects with a temporary grant of power as Senator purposefully in a spousal “two-fer” more selfishly to a brief “place card” - place holder - place to stand with Presidential mitre/lever still effectively too removed from our Constitutional office of our President - and seemingly re-labeled “private charity” of Clintons’ “commitments. 

We could already have been of stories of the Clintons caring just enough for all citizen people of Arkansas with a more local and democratic CLINTON COMPROMISED CARE PLAN - a “C.C.C.P.” their own.

We are now oddly to President Clinton as a one man show too “charitable” for us to see a return to growth economics for he so heavy handed and extra-Constitutional and meddling to throw all our gears and wheels from balance.  We have him speaking of what is a C.C.C.P. like as now finally for citizen people of New York - a CUOMO COMPROMISED COVERAGE PLAN - and so as of one once a “Clinton expert” now running away from his past “Clinton expertise” and too a more humane and less nationally political or less of a new nationalism better for all localism with supposedly six separate new “regions.”

So if President Clinton only now needed more people to help him pixelate his too “charitable” and extra-Constitutional attempts to be “Machiavellian” with as little surrendering of “presidential Power” we might see North Korean styled morning and evening calisthenics.  Of course he only now may be without since he should have long been recusing himself of any and all global initiatives to avoid conflicts of interests of the mash about “Hillary” being not “President” as it may have been - but worse than a “Machiavellian” so for her his spouse as being just Secretary of State for one of his wantings to be more a “prince” or “underling.”  These are days trying to Clintons schemes as back ups to back ups to back ups - as compromised of compromised Clintons.  Bill Clinton is more a pixalation of one than that of the cultural coordination of the humans worked Olympic opening graphic ceremonies.

We have a history about the Clintons where when they could have they did not - where when with state powers they deferred and stayed with their place cards and place holding bias to move as soon as possible to more effecting to practical holding, even though extra-Constitutional, of as much “Presidential” or “executive” power as they could consummate for their duo.  We have that neither Arkansas nor New York, and as prior to Governor Cuomo, was near of a C.C.C.P. - was to their own as if even a Cuomo Compromised Coverage Plan — we have a history of Clintons trying to do at least for their state what a Republican Governor once of Massachusetts did do for his.

If our 99% associate too much with “charity” of the CGI - the Clintons’ global initiatives - of either State or their private more selfish fiefdom of “commitments” near too much like “loyalty oath” maintenance, political - then our 99% run the risk of being an identifiable 1% to another 99% not quite wired up to knowing such - knowing such about just themselves. 

We do have this “economic” conundrum where the persistence by President Clinton of wanting to still be “President” while also “Prince” or “King” is now too so much extra-Constitutional “charity” and initiatives once a perk and pleasure held to realm of actual present holders of our office of the President and so that his “activity” while also suspect for conflicts he should have recused himself from for his spouse - we have this married mess of a political spousal “two-fer” that still persists with merriment inappropriate for our standard American ways and traditions.

We have that the greatest Holidays “economic” news could be that President Clinton has finally recused himself and agreed to finally just fade away.  We have that his continued attempts to hold as much absolute power as he can manage and so now necessarily with a facade so of “charitable” needs to go away before a “growth” economy can reboot. 

I have that though President Clinton may mention Governor Cuomo and six or so new regions and an inventiveness to help him move past his history and it so of a failed “Clinton EXPERTISE” - and now such that I can say that New York with a C.C.C.P. now that could have been a Senator Clinton sponsored self-help citizen effort as a CLINTON COMPROMISE CARE PLAN — that it is that Governor Cuomo is now more nearly using what I saw Clintons in 90s lift some from me and my writing and but now yet some near two decades afterwards and now only finally nearer to the ways I was actually at meaning. 

I am now to feeling for Governor Cuomo stuck with President Clinton trying with a new book to seem relevant and useful though quite an antagonist of my tales, and some decades on now.  I do wish New York well - I do wish New Yorkers well and as I look to joining them myself especially now that their C.C.C.P. like efforts are more American than any yet fronted by either Clinton - either of Clintons’ “two-fer” duo.

It is bad enough that while appearing to still have power President Clinton with his new book is off his rocker with conception for underwater mortgages so as reported with a suggestion that banks take a “ownership” on paper and not just because his “global” initiatives now long to damaging a balance for a foundation to a new “growth economy” as “too charitable”! 

We have that it looks like another miraculous solution from PBC and yet while he more than most should know and consider that most such applicable banking situations per assets like personal homes are now largely specifically due to his own culpability to a future where mortgage duration is set to be shorter than our revaluation duration and such that “full value” not available now for “banking practices” discussions - that homes even with a “bank” taking a convenient “ownership” on paper cannot be since such as reported is to a return to “full market value” within terms of standard mortgages.

We, this Christmas season of “Happy Holidays” for all, now wise to “King” or “Prince” Clinton and so that it is now fashionable to discuss 1996 as if a Christmas Carol where whence an “if then” could have us all better now and in the future of “if then” a if only Clintons hadn’t been re-elected.  We seem safe from President Clinton at least as from mandatory morning and evening “human computer” like mass calisthenics with placards/place cards for pixelation - we seem safe from grand march grounds full of citizens following President Clinton in any calisthenics, and now maybe as well in his tired and too selfish politics and its current coverage as “charitable” - quite at least “Machiavellian.”

Happy Holidays this Christmas season!  Please be “charitable” how you can and might - please though question “authority” of yours, others, and supposedly of Clintons especially as per their power holding and global initiatives “too charitable” is seems quite for a restored nation again of foundations once anewly for “GROWTH.”

As you roll out however you roll out this season and in the new year:  There is hardly now a place you can go, even if just in your state of a “new region” more a “county” about where you cannot be “on tour” of a “Clinton Tour” to see just dilapidated schools and roads - and wonder too on their unnecessary trillion in cuts at surplus popularity quite devoid of any “charity.” 

If only the Clintons hadn’t cut an extra trillion in their second term from budgeted spending of then available and allocated funds that were to save and create jobs and as well so that it could have been at least re-budgeted towards repairing or
replacing schools, and at least some as in time for levies and/or bridges. 

There is near no place you can travel now without seeing areas in distress not appropriate to a political: 

“If only the Clintons hadn’t had a second term…”  If only the Clintons - either Clinton whether for Arkansas, New York or the USA had been whence of a C.C.C.P. their own and not to so many left so compromised by their comprising “Machiavellian” politik.

Comments Off
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 9:21 am

[This piece original to  1/4/2011]

The Big Stream sets up a new body politic - twain!

A watershed has again been stirred with currents tumultuous for some more than others - welcome to America - some up river west of the Mississippi have marked a new year - some soon as well up a river of a Connecticut now next may captain a new steerage.

America is remarkable for what can be called its Rhine politics - its river effluence considerateness democratic.   We Americans of the loo of Lewis and Louisiana have Thomas Jefferson to doubt as well about our river politics.  We are now anew past a first flush of caucus participation less of being like up a stream without a pole or paddle device.

Is it unique to be of a “Municipal” consideration as Mr. Binks was so by Rudyard Kipling where our national elections are marked partly respective of particular gravity and polite and impolite currents.  Is America unique for commencement of new political democratic checking and buttressing to begin up river and then to more Rorschachian and Freudian southern in a female and then male clarity?  Is it our right and tradition since west of the Mississippi formed and constituted as American river states to be so of Kipling political lesson about Mr. Binks and his knowing that if they just kept their sewers clear…?

But for stream keepers and river keepers would Iowans be with New Hampshire in a contrariness to now?

We have natural architecture to discuss and as well inappropriate Presidential architecture of too much sass, we are not talking about an ark - though Freudians may wax Rorschachian with water so near such “Presidential” that “vessels” in play.

We can twain a “remarkable” about the phallic of the Clinton Presidential Library design by Polshek and construction per Clintons as some as if a big southern grey Naval gun - and with “universal” waters flowing constantly near.  All politics is still about river keeping even and especially now as we all move at home further from the bias that Republicans were environment and waterway destructors - as the evil job creating industrialists.

Because President Clinton’s presidential library is in a state south of Iowa and not as well carpetbagged to New York State and so then maybe there near Erie or Hudson flowage it is appropriate to discuss and inappropriateness of his Library architectural message of design, and location.  We could criticize such as simply inappropriate for of a lower state river or stream politics but then maybe properly expressive for an Iowan or Minnesotan. 

A boat or ark as a better paired vessel seems natural to the Natural State of Arkansas, yes?

Effluence is of our national reset again with Iowa then New Hampshire, South Carolina, and then Florida.  Freud and Rorschach and Machiavelli are all at least unconsciously present anew nationally with each new current considerations of events or non events.  Have you read Rudyard Kipling’s “Municipal”?  — Have you seen “Star Wars” and then considered it dramatic and equally telling that “Ja Ja Binks” can be said to be quite a “Gunga Din”?

Our rivers are all much cleaner these days - it really couldn’t have only have been Republican “Industrialists” to blame.

Oh, South Carolina - Freud too, should see you as so feminine - as most feminine, to at least Rorschach.

Mr. Florida first we all must consider some that the Connecticut cuts the Connecticut as well as up river - up stream effluence political reconsideration, democratic.

Thomas Jefferson did buy a big loo!  He did pick up cheap quite a few old American loos with his Louisiana Purchase.  How we came to head waters about a minni us or them as of Minnesota and a booted Louisiana pair with Mississippi’s leaves one to query the currents of debt again this year - an I or they owen - near Iowans.  That west of our big stream that is our Mississippi in all its marks and twaining seems more of a political statesmanship man wrought geographically in prose and poetry, how so so more like squared away.

Really the President Clinton Library either for seeming a big grey gun an international naval weapon, phallic and Freudian while also seeming inappropriate and classless for a southern river heritage - a gravity for a lower river state.

Really the President Clinton Library seems rude and crass “bridging” now as an effrontery to neighbor state Mississippi.  And, it seems alarming as erected for the south, the institution of the Presidency, and the whole world as taggable as skinned in a Confederate Gray.

And, now all off to New Hampshire and a consideration for effluence political more of the Connecticut.  Fewer hams may now be in this political contest - may soon be of full and proper currents events relativity, political - as per leadership.  Fewer are to ham - to so walk - the shires than traversed the fields of Iowa and the Mississippi flowage, too.

How have our rivers gotten cleaner.  Really it couldn’t have just been the fault of Republican “Industrialists”?
Really haven’t we still to be concerned of the grays of the Clintons’ - the gray waters even of their Whitewater and erected so old southern Presidential Library - it so originally meant for “Hillary’s” “Bill” to be tipped out and proud over a thought poetic universal feminine flowings?  Isn’t there a here lew in the loos of the Clintons set Columbian districted as of a plantation addressed and piped of Whitehaven pride?

If we are to have an Arkansas and Louisiana not now seceded bodies then we have a poetry in our election orderings with Iowa ahead of New Hampshire.  We have a poetry unless we were to lean on too small a microcosm politics with say the State of Connecticut to a sufferage after South Carolina and Florida if New Hampshire were to precede Iowans of Mississippi and Missouri.

Have you looked at least at to see that stream effluence is as well a local issue for Iowans?

And, so to be brief:  While we consider each new political issue and leadership quality we can appreciate Connecticut and yet move some to architectural Americana that could with “Bill’s” Library “gun” phallicism so Freudian and Rorschachian consider that if Governor of South Carolina Nikki Haley were to become President and well endowed to a Presidential Library of her own she could and should maybe have it designed and built as a giant egg.

Our rivers and streams set up a new body politic - a necessary municipal!  —   Mark!  Twain!  Comprehend!

Comments Off
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 12:18 pm

It is coincidental that a treatment of forgiveness by Martin Luther is now apropos to a new celebration of Martin Luther King Jr.;  It would honor Martin Luther King Jr. if the Ten Commandments were on public display more generally across The United States of America, at least.  It seems there is to be yet discerned a differentiation between “forgiveness” in the rule of Germans of the known Holocaust as per Christian Aryans and a now updated “forgiveness” official to Iranians as Aryans but as at least of Islam as Shia.

Martin Luther King Jr. lived of a times to well know his struggles did pale in comparison suffering of those of the Jewish about Europe, at least, during World War II.  Yet it is for Christians that Martin Luther preached, however, to be like “bold in your sins.”

Iran of today as mostly non-Christian Aryans of Persia and its poetic seem historically maybe not be be as feared as Christian Aryans of the theaters of World War II.  A nation so now of such a large populace as so youthified in a considerable majority and of legends and traditions in culture and literacy should today be nearest yet to being of good socio-economic relations with The United States of America.  Though Saddam Hussein can be said to have war to nearly exterminate his and Irani Shia people the young now of such massive majority in Irani demographics have it as known that the USA did liberate Iran and its majority of Shia people from Saddam Hussein, without being to occupying a Middle Eastern neighbor. 

Whom are now at risk most of repeating history for not sharing a knowing of it?  Are people of the world more at risk for not knowing a real history of the too little discussed problems of the Clintons while administering during the Clintons’ years?  Are people of the world more at risk somehow, otherwise, if Iran can be said to even have a majority ignorant or in denial of there having really been World War II and the Holocaust?  The demographics of modern Iran, to the People of The United States, seem able to be hosted hospitably in ways as not possible in the history of the world prior to the Bush administration.

Though it must be more abhorrent that the Holocaust did occur and so as it did so much as it seems by Christian Aryans we have that the eight years of the Clintons’ administration are still dangerous and as well to be abhorred for them of an “official” State speak that was religiously based and with a special bias of a bigotry against the Shia - at least of Iraq.

The current and unusual demographics of the modern Iran have yet to be explained geo-politically for general news consumption and political understanding by most of the People of The United States of America.  Iran should be a wonder as a new and even emerging growth market for export and import cored to appreciating cultural specificities now with so many of its people all so young in such a market demo of a demos still mostly under or near the age of 35.  And, while considerable as nearer of an opposite to its neighbor Afghanistan of an economy near unique to 80% supplies of world’s opium needs and so yet of a realm with near 75% of its inhabitants said illiterate in even their own tribal tongue(s).

I do not know nor can I even proffer an amateur opine as to specifics for caution or grace as per “forgiveness” in the culture of Aryans of Persia as Irani non-Christians.  As an citizen of The United States of America I like staying to my career inclination to be one whom finds markets of peoples whom might and would choose to partake by a elected purchase and not be told or mandated towards a subscription of opinion and/or poetry - especially if just of mine.  Modern Irani by a majority should now be nearer to a special cultural import and export based relating than maybe ever before - at least in recent history.  I don’t know if such can be surmised as wise or realistic though between all Irani and that of the Russian Federation.

I do still believe, and as since the first days so of thinking such as it was news, that President Bill Clinton started off wrong in the Middle East and especially as per Iran and Iraq and then just made relations more impossible.  It is that I still consider him un-American and un-Constitutional to being an American an infidel to it so Constituted specifically by the First Amendment as to his official Iraqi diplomatic speak of near ‘(Iraqi) Shia are not capable of governing themselves.’

I do still believe, we are more at risk of a danger of repeating the mistakes of the Clintons than now it seems to seeing other Aryans make the mistakes of the Hitler boldness in sins of Aryans about the Holocaust of World War II.  As I have asserted I have disagreed with the diplomacy of the Clinton administration since near their first days in Power I should now inform my readers that I did fax to the Bush administration many post 9/11 posits of advice - so many it may have been near 700 so sent yet with just a few or a couple specific to suggestions on balance and nuance for speak related to Iran and its quest for nuclear energy and maybe yet a seeking towards nuclear weapons.  For now I can be brief and say proudly that I seemed to have gotten it right then and since for such haven’t had to much revise or even reconsider then shared opinions.

Right, I look at the current demographics of the modern Iran and it for a history of culture and poetry and think for me at least they are a rich target consumer base.  Again, I am not a typical politician or a politician at all is stating such as stereotypically politicians are preoccupied at finding ways to mandate not sell consumer choice and participation.  But as per a risk of repeating history and seeing set backs to progress I still strongly believe our greater risk is from a return to a governance by the Clintons due to their specific past and quite official bias and bigotry against Shia people.

Since the first days of the Bush administration, or at least in the post 9/11 days, Iran has been becoming better in a demographics of informed and cultured youth majority for good relations with people of The United States of America.  But yet we need foreign and domestic experts at least for consumer and market demographics to establish such as a economically viable guidance.  It is to better for experts to explain a dynamic for such a state of such a young and vast majority as now more inclined to favor the USA over at least the Russian Federation. 

To be yet to discussing critical “forgiveness” politics it seems we have to ask why one nation now has so young and so vast a majority in a populace, historically speaking. 

If it is because Saddam Hussein killed off a near million of the fathers of Iran than now thanks to the Bush administration albeit late prosecution of Iraq’s President these now should be in a majority thankful towards the USA  in ways they still otherwise should be bitter if Bush had just repeated like the recent history himself of the Clintons. 

If yet it is more because of a concern that the USA wasn’t going to be able to stop the U.S.S.R. in Afghanistan during the Cold War years of Soviet Socialism so expansive and on the march then yet it is too that the young of modern Iran should be favoring the people of The United States of America and some coalition countries at least more than any of the Russian Federation and former Soviet block countries.

Modern Iran seems set up culturally quite poetically too now to be to a new and improved socio-economic and even diplomatic future with the west - with the people of The United States of America.  But where are the experts - those not Clinton apologists to biased to hiding the dangers of their past official bigotry as a bias against Shia that was so un-American it was of them of State speak as if true so as nearly like specifically ‘The Shia are incapable of governing themselves.’

Does the whole world or maybe just the people of The United States not specifically compromised as Clinton Democrats or loyalists have a good and workable socio-economic cultural and poetic future now set up with Iran due to its unusual demographics of so many so young?  Due at least to the advent of social media I have to believe such educated and cultured of the modern Iran know that those more Christian Aryans really were quite bold in their sins and of World War II and the Holocaust. 

I do not though know whom they may prefer intellectually between Martin Luther and Martin Luther King Jr.

It just seems thanks to the administration of George W. Bush as cannot be proffered for the administration of William J. Clinton we should have a better future with the modern however nuclear Iran of it so of it youthified demographics.

Whether it is so young now exclusively, and not yet at war largely while so young, because the USA and coalition did finally liberate Iraq and get to that quite late prosecution of Saddam Hussein and/or because it thought it prudent to grow and grow young future warriors while Saddam Hussein killed so many of Iran’s fathers but in a fear that The United States of America was going to fail at stopping the Soviet expansionist socialist march in Afghanistan it does now seem that Iran can be a friendly nation more with the USA and specifically because so many so young there are in a real knowing relating to a general peace in their regions much because of at least the diplomacy of the Bush based Freedom Agenda.

I must be to deferring to experts and theologists for a determination as to whether The United States of America without the Ten Commandments ever could have or would have been neutrally positioned to so have yet saved so many of the modern Iran from wars like the Clintons still were stoking of wars of the centuries or at least decades of Soviet expansionism.

I must offer that it seems if of nuclear weapons these modern Irani people seem likely to be to any justification for targeting of those however once Soviet long before seeing cause to sight otherwise at people of The United States of America.

                                        *      *      *

[Note:  For posterity now as DUTY memoir by former Secretary of Defense Robert Gates is out - as per #CitRB per me you all now have his works to historically reference and compare to mine and with my blogging and treatments as well of opinions dating back to original conceptions quite about the Persian Gulf War and what was or might not be wise or politically prudent as military or political strategies - and quite as it became as more an exit figuring more as a delay from moving on Baghdad, not an planned as worked by Clintons abandonment.]

Comments Off
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 10:08 am

It is yet not too early to discern a MODERN DEMOCRAT from the net economic example specific to the history of guidance and performance of President Barack Obama.

There are a variety of truths about these past five years that should be self evident even to the lay.

To start at “leadership” it behoove us to look at an obvious silence and inaction by the President at key moments in calendars of commerce habits that have recently passed.  Most recently we have that the Hollywood spectacle of The Golden Globes came and passed without a reset in guidance by the President to effect a change away from his priorities set in austerity in political severity towards he being a hero that saves the planet from his long posited doom akin to echoed “an end of the world as we know it” dogma.  Also to such discerning we have that the President let the fall shopping season start off flat with the fall TV schedule commenced with he also of a commercial silence and inaction that left his default alarmism as the dominant political instructive.

It was to an experienced economic growth lay pride quite predictable that the Holiday season should be flat to dull when it was that the President let the newness and energy of the fall TV season pass unutilized but as if by his silence and inaction guidance as a political message that his austerity was still to be the prioritized for his general Welfare Posterity.  It seems to late for lay or scientific about economics to assuage a net reputation for the President but as taggable as of an austerity politics.

Whom among us now can attest to the President as not firstly being at an economics for austerity? 

Whom among us now can wax a related discourse pertinent to a Posterity in austerity now, as it seems timely that such is now self evident, but for a shyness, and coyness political, respectively of the President, as it seems we are at a critical point about unemployment compensation extensions that due to such economics and guidance now are of an Obama prudence about a new normal which may need change?  Whom now can explain that any extension of benefits from the Federal Government as per Federal Programs is likely to be counter productive due to a “new normal” in austerity towards saving the planet firstly and better to be delegated or surrendered to states and their communities and/or faith based good will organized?

After five years it shouldn’t just be self evident that President Obama is an austerity President - it seems established as his dogma and of his dogged dogmatic economics.  His austerity is as well a New Deal austerity while of a dichotomy with a greater severity of his climate change politics of priorities at being a hero president who saves the entire planet from the postured “end of the world as we know it” brave leadership.

What austerity any may want to blame on Republicans or the President immediately prior to President Obama should be checked - checked and re-checked.  President Obama after five years is evidently at austerity priorities as his guidance for a legacy at being to a general Welfare more perfect Union.  President Bush was forced into austerity - if it fair to say so - by the politics of Speaker Nancy Pelosi so defensively of a pride in the Clintons’ surpluses that President Bush was prohibited from reversing the spending cuts of the trillion in cuts to surplus by the Clintons’ “economics” and so evidently himself prohibited from spending on the items he would have needed to rebudget if to be other than as if at austerity himself.

A discerning to a MODERN DEMOCRAT now by way of a dissection of the past five years need though a control balance check and as well a considerable rating against an earlier politics and economic guidance by earlier Democrat leadership.  President Obama has remained silent and of economic inaction at critical times in the calendar of commerce habits so as to have his default alarmism remain suggestively dominant.  When he let the opportunity of the fall TV season start without moderating a climate condition status update he so rendered onto his legacy a priority still of the original alarmism of a feared end of the world.

A lay perspective, however quite experienced and proud, is though that President Obama as now obviously and simply so evidently pro austerity is yet to be considered as better than President Clinton.  Clintonomics have cost too many arms and legs.  The Clintons’ reign rained instability and irrational commerce.  What has hit the fan to justify President Obama in a general Welfare to a more perfect Union economics by austerity is much how it is a prima facia Clinton autopsy factoid that any economic dissection shows a macro/raw/gross pathology to the governance and example of the earlier Democrat Presidency of the Clintons.

It seems self evident that President Obama has embraced austerity for his legacy.  He yet still seems shy and coy about such publicly but then he by his silence and inaction has let critical dates of the calendar of commerce pass unutilized otherwise.

In defense of President Obama as of a politics at a New Deal Austerity and as well a separate economics for a more perfect Union general Welfare in healthcare and home economics change in austerity we have that the OLD DEMOCRAT as per the Clintons’ example haunts by trillions.

It seems the USG has essentially needed to reverse all or most of the cuts the Clintons wrought to have a trillion cut in surplus and that it is likely that a simple economics as per regular government accounting has it that the People are facing math of such budgeting to return such once set spending now at costs easily twice the original allotments for the same or yet less in reality.

It seems teh USG in a more complex and socio-accounting for the Clintons’ trillion cut for surplus politics has to then account for how really expensive their unnecessary trillion in cuts have in time proven to be.  Beyond that to put spending back in for items long ago removed as if unnecessary but later found to have been necessary and yet cut has maybe been twice as expensive by simple accounting we have that there are complex costs to be figured now and in a defense of President Obama as a MODERN DEMOCRAT — what are the real costs from the inaction and avoidance in the foreign policies of the Clintons that removed funding needed to maybe provide the stitches in time for Afghanistan and Iraq - firstly?

It seems in defense of President Obama as a MODERN DEMOCRAT and to justify at least the above two of his austerity platforms we have a simple comparative math that can show the Clintons cost the People three trillion dollars in costs that were not necessary nor prudent.

1. It has been suggested years ago by one claiming to be a doctor friend of the Clintons that due to the increase in personal body weight across the nation since they became the guiding first couple the People could have saved a trillion in healthcare costs nationally if only the personal body weight average had stayed what it was before them.

2. It is now posited more specifically for a discerning about the austerity guidance of President Obama that there likely has been a cost of likely a trillion dollars to return what was near a trillion in irresponsible cuts by the Clintons surpluses so that it has likely been simply accountable that the Clintons’ trillion in surpluses have cost easily two trillion to correct. 

3. It is that President Obama has to by an accordance in DUTY by his Secretary of Defense Bob Gates, it seems, be already to a conclusion that his remarks in his Nobel Peace Prize Acceptance Speech that slapped at the legacy of the Clintons with derision about dangers from their years of inaction and avoidance (per Iraq & Afghanistan?) have amounted to a general economic reality that the trillion dollar in costs for President Bush’s Operation Iraqi Freedom are yet complex costs of a trillion necessary due to the OLD DEMOCRATS Clintons’ surpluses prioritizing naivete.

Perchance President Obama is ready to escape his shyness and coyness as per the real pathology of the now out of wack USG budgeting.  A real dissection after his fifth can be as lay and simple as the above broached math - President Obama is actually of a budget now at least of three trillion in costs that shouldn’t or needn’t have ever been - President Obama has to be more scientific now though while it seems generally self evident and publicly accountable that there is a bad OLD DEMOCRAT to he at a justifiable MODERN DEMOCRAT.

For now we seem to be able to conclude, albeit in a lay positing, that President Obama is of an austerity economic guidance he thinks he can justify and maybe to for it seems to be even to improving family values - at least multi-generational tolerance and co-habitation.  President Obama now seems fit a new MODERN DEMOCRAT tag for he has toed up austerity at least with two different political priorities of his platform.  Whether the Clintons as OLD DEMOCRATS cost the USG and People 3-7 trillion dollars unnecessarily from their surpluses and tagged inaction and avoidance now is something for the pride of President Barack Obama.

Iraq and Afghanistan are still haunting with his Nobel Peace Prize Acceptance remarks so targeting the Clintons of an “inaction” and “avoidance” in foreign policies and smartly for his spoken of “dangers” from such seem now to be costing more and more in more and more trying ways.

Well, President Obama is now with the US People of his default alarmism still of his original prioritizing in concern for the planet firstly — we are all now to behoove his prudence that austerity is justified and that his original admonishing that the People were eating too much and spending too much and as well at not saving enough per their home economics is his MODERN DEMOCRAT dogma for 2014.

We still it seems need a GREEN MINIMALISM metric establishment by our President for us to be otherwise.  We need to hear more than a state of the state for the budget of The United States of America - we need to hear a status report of details to his progress at being the hero who is saving the entire planet with his global warming, as well justified austerity. 

After five years this seems simply so and expectantly self evident.  It all really may be so simple that the above brevity is yet sufficient for a clear Democrat tagging in pathology.

[*Note:  For an earlier treatment to costs of Iraq as per Democrats see OBAMA’S RETREAT at]

Comments Off
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 2:43 pm

[The following is original to  7/30/12]

Developing now:   We have ourselves within a hundred days to discern and judge as citizens still or now as more just “subjects” the dangers of the hot air emitted since the 2008 races commenced and with Speaker Pelosi hot for SURPLUSES.

The simplest way to preface, in a more scientific way, the post 2009 “I inherited this …” is to maybe look at what happened to the price of gasoline due to Al Gore as Mr. Alarming Science of GLOBAL WARMING ALARMISM.  We should look carefully at such subjective politicking not so much with a debate about the “warming” so much as we should reconsider and look at how many other options were actually available then, economically speaking, to address or fix such if so.

It would be too simple to be stupid, quite, though to speak of this now as all Al Gore’s fault with he responsible most for a over-simplified dramatization devoid of objectivism that was far too alarming to our economics and markets - even to the very fabric of our sociologicals.  We shouldn’t look at this forced austerity of us so nearly of a new depression as just the fault of Al Gore. 

We have it as well to be measured reasonably that when Senator Hillary Clinton announced “Hillary for President” she did tear asunder much about our national sense - its historic prudence and modesty.  For now it is more important though just to focus on how besides the subjective alarmism of GLOBAL WARMING over dramatization we have quite that “Hillary for President” and her revolutionary pronouncement to be to seizing all oil company profits after elected still as a quite evident causal factor too.

These are the hundred days, give or take, that try our souls anew.  There may be no Holy Trinity in candidate Mitt Romney’s understanding of the original sins that brought us necessarily to this forced New Deal Austerity.  It may be some a putting of the chicken before the egg now to have already punctuated this analysis as a “forced New Deal Austerity.”

There is mystery about the politics of our time - yet less about how there were more ways to address an actual GLOBAL WARMING or CLIMATE CHANGE than the few partisan and quite political offerings yet embraced by Democrats.

There is a mystery, sure, about how Candidate Mitt Romney may not be to seeing a Holy Trinity in this, but then really how mysterious is it that it seems to have been a conspiracy or just mess of four - of the four we know of as Al Gore, Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Former candidate of “Hillary for President”, and, as well candidate and now President Barack Hussein Obama?

For the sake of simplicity it might be more dramatic and yet easier to fathom as per these trying days of our O’s zone to consider the about four as of a collusion and conspiracy as if an un-Holy trinity meant to be kept mysterious if only by always allowing a deniability for one of its primary bad actors.

We didn’t have to embrace the over dramatized subjective alarmism of GLOBAL WARMING ALARMISM as the end all be all of political solutions to scientific problems.  We have engineers - we had other ways to build a solution already available and quite well funded.  We didn’t need the socialistic pronouncement of “Hillary for President” by candidate Senator Clinton to hawkish bend orated to us of a time where Americans should have their Government seize “all oil company profits.”

As to this “un-Holy trinity” we can see the workings of their hands towards a crisis upon a crisis to a much higher price for gasoline so that their idealism could have a chance to have political feet if only for a brief early atmosphere of acquiescence while stuck in a fog of the partisan polarizing storm fronts - we can see a simple mashable “taggable” for them as of a responsibility specifically for the spike in gas prices that then set off the collapse of the housing bubble once the hyper-consumerism that Speaker Pelosi long defended, with her hard to explain belief in the Clintons’ SURPLUSES, as it did have people not able to also afford their mortgages if they did afford the new gas prices needed to get to the very job that they had only because the “hyper-consumerism” of Clintonomics wasn’t yet quite of people actually of spending too much more than they actually had an ability to afford.  It became simply and quickly a decision for many to either pay for gas to get to work or to pay their mortgage.

Thanks to Senator Clinton, Senator Obama, Speaker Pelosi and their alarmist idealist Al Gore and his preaching of at least bad and limited political solutions amidst his questionable “science” and moral priorities, for his people, where so many seemed meant to see themselves as less important than the terra firma about them, we now have them much more clearly as culpable for politics as of an un-Holy trinity that did cause the price of gas to spike and therefore were mostly those of the original political sins that caused the economy to go belly up once the funds needed for gas had become the same funds only available for mortgage payments or maintenance of the risky hyper-consumerism ushered in knowingly by President Bill Clinton.

We certainly had numerous other ways for a new doctrine political for climate concerns.  We didn’t need to blindly rush to a unfounded faith in the over-dramatized preaching by Al Gore and while it so devoid of objectivism.  We had ways to add new industries as for a prudent mobilization maybe still too nationalistic that wouldn’t have been so as under a faith in this un-Holy trinity to the same mistakes (?) so to a mass austerity as was already undisputed evident truth in Spain with it known not unknown that such if spread to America so would as well cost two regular jobs for each new “green” politically figured job.

We may all now be so globally of a New Deal Austerity specifically because of this “O” zone or bad science and polarizing idealistic partisan politics where we were told to accept the few offered Democrat Party solutions and not at all stray to consider so many other options that were then also available and even so that we could have been to addressing “CLIMATE CHANGE” by adding jobs in new industries without killing off existing jobs. 

What we know now is that we actually had time to consider other options and to better arrange a new believable economic path forward.  We see now there are many holes in the very thinking of the Democrat Party un-Holy trinity however amassed and yet too few are yet to the very simple causal fact based awakening that could even be enlightening since it seems straight talk sharable that the Democrats caused the spike in gas prices that set off the otherwise forced NEW DEAL AUSTERITY.

It seems an “Ah!” or “O - Oh!” “MOMENT” now with us all within a hundred days to save our nation. 

Please consider this alarmism - and fully.  Please reconsider all recent “CRISIS” based “alarmism” and especially as well the indefensible faith Speaker Pelosi kept and keeps, it seems, in the Clintons’ SURPLUSES and especially towards a personal enlightenment from a new way of thinking economically and not too subjectively that acknowledges at least three so of a un-Holy trinity, politically speaking, too long, now, for sure, where too many were asked to accept blindly that if she said the extra trillion of cuts by the Clinton First Couple “two-fer” political machinations were good then they must be good.

I don’t know what with all the “devil in the details” about all this politics whom of this Democrat Party trinity to deniability we might or should redraw and toss from quarters first in at least our thoughts.  It seems they let it be written and let it be so that we now all be so much to a forced NEW DEAL AUSTERITY even though we can all fairly still question how sinful such may be for it seemingly long of a designed machination and effort worked while such were thinking they could just blame someone or more else.

Yes, we know how to make ice - for starters.  Yes, some entrepreneurs were quickly innovative upon the above alarmism however unfounded to inventions of collectors that could be made cheaply and located discretely at congestion points to capture and store the bad carbon based exhausts. 

It seems we had ways to pace our nation without such politics about a CLIMATE CHANGE forward without killing off old carbon based jobs so aggressively.  It seems we had others with whom we could have kept faith, and sounder economics.

The Democrats, by chasing too much ideologically too many ideologicals all at once, may have been to creating, accidentally, this economic down times.  The Dems with their excessive rash embrace of ideologicals may have caused us to lose a real and recent chance to have had a new ROMANTIC AGE economic growth boom era.  This said now, and about all the changes to fairness due, and possible around taxation, in this century, Republicans might at least be able to restore GROWTH and around A NEW RENAISSANCE even though Democrats seem to have over-written all chances we had to actually have a new ROMANTIC ERA in at least The United States of America - in The USA.
Comments Off
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 12:34 pm

[The following is original to  2/19/2013]

We have that “capitalism” and “socialism” were top keywords for 2012, and, now with 2013 we are due a grand diligence about “cost consciousness” - at least.

We can conclude later that President Obama has corned himself politically with a gridlock of and from his own absolutes.

To be brief, and yet poignant, while a hashable audience is e-assembled, for social media networking, and physically organized gathered as a #smw ecosystem:

We have that these days of President Obama as re-elected with a mandate for austerity and gridlock have us stuck much because of some of these works of the Administration of the Clintons:

If he were to trying to actually sell and effect a new growth economy wouldn’t he necessarily be about a different politics?

It figures that President Obama now owns the down economy and that enough may now be realizing that the Democrats actually did far more to cause the economic downturn than even President Bush’s tax cuts.

Many can easily fathom how to twain a marking of blame upon the Clintons for their eight years after they get over the first condemned bridge about the Clintons’ SURPLUSES as of a trillion in cuts that neither our Government nor our economy needed.

It is hard to avoid speaking of dangers from political ABSOLUTES now for there is so much that relates almost solely economically and politically just to the workings of the Administration of the Clintons.  Obama has cornered himself with his ABSOLUTE “It is all Bush’s fault!”  Or, the Clintons trapped newly elected President Obama with an insistence that he should go again with “WE’RE RIGHT - THEY’RE WRONG” absolutism.

President William Jefferson Clinton knew enough to be aware that he shouldn’t have proceeded with a SURPLUS while he pursued his risky loan housing bubble economic plans as an unfunded Federal social program.  Those two political items should not ever be able to work together or well co-exist.

The Clintons messed up our economics by rigging succession schemes for Hillary to be set up to be asap elected to return them to our Executive seat of “holding of office” of our Office of the President.  There are historical moments to consider as our economy is stuck with a jobless recovery much still that precisely rest about the workings of the Administration of the Clintons.

The Clintons’ SURPLUSES could go down as the greatest economic and/or political blunder of THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA of at least the past century.  We had no economic or governmental need for that cutting of an additional trillion in cuts past the trillion the GOP found to cut (too quickly) to balance our Federal budget.

The SURPLUSES linger in these down economic times of us much still in the “ditch” yet hardly as critically as they should.  To understand the SURPLUSES it helps to consider the scheming to successionary Power by the Clintons to as much as possible set Hillary up to asap return them to such seat of Powers for the both of them again.  It is critical that you do not accept or believe the innocent portrayal of Hillary Clinton as in the book or movie GAME CHANGE for she and Bill were of dating compatibility while at Yale Law School because they both wanted to be elected President.  She did not only after becoming “Senator Hillary Clinton” get to thinking she might want to be President herself and as from people having suggested the idea firstly to her.
The Clintons’s SURPLUSES now sit in a lacking safety about a media and politics too hesitant to consider them as contrary and conflicting to the very New Deal spending ideology of President Obama.  It seems as if there are two absolutes that do not and cannot fit together now still to propped up and marketed as if somehow they are actually compatible.  The Clintons stood up an unnecessary cutting of an additional trillion while there was no economic need for a surplus, and, President Obama stands up suggesting so much they said we didn’t need to spend even a trillion on is now actually necessary spending.

There are many condemned levies and roads and bridges and even schools that the Clintons took away available Federal dollars from.  In the case of Katrina and the failure of the Mississippi River Gulf Outlet (MR GO) their surpluses fit with the court’s finding of “gross negligence” upon our Federal Government to a date back to 1983 most negligently morally speaking on the legacy of the Administration of the Clintons for them of cutting money by a trillion for a political popularity from a SURPLUS thought most impossible and while it was not necessary economically nor for governance purposes.

We have it nearly as a truth self evident after past the first condemned bridge left to collapse by the Clintons’ SURPLUSES that it cannot have been as ABSOLUTE as President Obama decried with “IT IS ALL BUSH’S FAULT!”

The greatest economic threat if not just the most dangerous moral threat is that the Clintons’ SURPLUSES were only “necessary” politically to save a queen like plotted and schemed succession workings towards a President Hillary Clinton.  The Clintons needed to politically save themselves and their vast plotting too near to a reach at global autocratic power after the GOP proved that they could find a trillion in cuts to safely balance our Federal budget.  The Clintons would not have been able to sell anyone on more years for either of them then for their second term if they couldn’t prove that they too could find a thought impossible trillion to also cut.

Hillary Clinton much deserves the rapped tag as the “TRILLION DOLLA’ SURPLUS’D QUEEN” in poem/rap FUZZY MATH available at and where originally streamed and published via

President Clinton and Senate Banking chieftain Dodd are oddly remembered for having asked a small gaggle of banking heads to find a way to “gamble away” the known and/or expected risks inherent in Bill Clinton’s desire to be most popular by coyly burning our economic candle from both ends at once.  You can call it “a ditch” or that “it burned out” as expected - seemingly.

It is absolutely not now funny that President Obama’s Obamacare ACA was fronted as not meant to cover illegal immigrants while now of he of an immigration proposal that would have them all by their conservative estimate of 12 million to be fully covered it seems as citizens by about the time his Obamacare however costed otherwise is to then be in effect on the promises and predictions about it as affordable without these 12 million covered as well.

Only the Clintons needed the Clintons’ SURPLUSES of them also to a finding of a thought impossible trillion in cuts.  Without matching the GOP efforts of the balancing of our budget their scheming and effecting to line Hillary up would have been bust.  These are the same Clintons who cut a trillion in liew of spending on immigration reforms as well.

The Clintons’ SURPLUSES did take away the pipeline of Federal Government spending that needed the 4-7 year headstart to have kept enough employment in our economy for the risky lending housing bubble as run yet as their unfunded Federal social program.  The timing of such is nearly enough self evident now though hardly the political absolute it should rank with while incidentally chronological to a set up for economic collapse about 2006 or 2007.  It is that to have seen the housing not collapse the “shovel ready” jobs had to not have been cut by the Clintons’s SURPLUSES during their second term so that they would have been already processed and in the works with all necessary permitting for the “economics” then needed after the Clintonomics of stirring a hyper-consumerism ran the length of its short wick.

It is that President Obama is the President now maybe most trapped by ABSOLUTES of his own orations.  But that said it is absolutely a real concern that the Clintons were offered political protection like of a “WE’RE RIGHT - THEY’RE WRONG” polarizing political partisanship then quite only able to lead to gridlock.  But with these shared it is important to really consider how absolutely correct I am in sharing that the Clintons were the only ones that needed the SURPLUSES and politically to save a succession scheming to line Hillary up for an inevitable anointing more as if a “queen.”

We have all long been paying too high a price for the SUPLUSES of the Clintons.  And it is absolutely contradictory that the Clintons can be economically right for so much cutting, and that President Obama can yet be so right for wanting to spend so much once cut as unnecessary as if it is still necessary.

The Clintons’ SURPLUSES do deserve to go down in history as one of our greatest national economic blunders of the past century.  President Clinton did know enough to know he shouldn’t have pursued surpluses and his risky lending programs with his Clintonomics of a pimped out hyper-consumerism — but resisting temptations (political) is historically of record a characteristic not as of a “strong suit.”

A while ago while being a partisan political operator against his promises to operate his CGI as non-partisan and non-political he in an interview with Maria Bartiromo proffered an “expertise” about economies needing time to recover science that by his own words and phraseology if actually an “expert”, and if such affirms he was an expert while President, did condemn himself as knowingly having been of doing what he knew he economically shouldn’t have done while President.

Beyond this we are of a 2013 as much needing a pop trending for key word relevance about “capitalism” and “socialism” still.  We though need to find a way to break down the ABSOLUTES of and by President Obama to get to the realistic realm of “cost consciousness” - this is needed as we also need to really discuss tax reforms, and still immigration.

Comments Off
Filed under: POLITICS
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 10:23 am

[The following is original to 1/5/2013]

We have heard a lot about “fair share” these past weeks, and, we gladly haven’t heard too much about coal.

We have hardly heard from Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton, and nor have we yet had the fair discussion of how much “coal” this “lady” deserved/deserves.

What is right?  What is wrong?  What was and is “Playing Politics”?  What needs to be done?

We have a leading woman character too written of a presumption of innocence not fitting the amount of baggage she carries around, and, we have that she meddled in similar affairs earlier that are of records stored somewhere.

It is wrong to forget THE BENGHAZI FOUR, and, it is wrong to ignore that “Hillary” used to be FLOTUS Clinton.

President Barack Hussein Obama may be avoiding jousting at Libya as if just a windmill, and, VP Biden may be loyal and subservient with such hoofing and pedestrian tripping.

It is wrong to let go or ignore that Senator Clinton did reportedly vote for OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM, and, that she voted for a war like “operation” without having read the related intelligence reports.

Records of the Administration of the Clintons that are related just for her travels and foreign meddling are much of protections of political privacy wanting of that which remains of their maybe thirty years of “secrecy.”

President Obama and his trusty borrow also mounted sidekick VP Biden are right not to joust at Libya and Benghazi as just “windmills” — they are wrong - so wrong as Secretary of State Clinton - much now more so for having “Played Politics” with “terrorism” while such considerable as actually an “act of war” expecting a serious response.

Simply the foreign policies for the vast and varied regions from Tripoli to the Afghanistan and Pakistan border are considerably different between this administration and its predecessor administration and the co-administration of the Clintons then before such. 

We do not have a common thread that needs us to think this administration has to be treated with kid gloves to avoid incriminating the previous administration of the other party.

Sorry to say our Congress has a hard lot served as their trails to ride and walk about this to an “honorable” and “respectable” or “chivalrous” soldiering.  Hillary Clinton, as failed and failing still Secretary of State, is a can of worms politically speaking. 

We have that these matters do relate as per the injustice and unprofessional lack of foresight and preparedness by “leadership” of Madam Secretary Mrs. Clinton to a presumption of innocence for her despite her past flip flopping as per Operation Iraqi Freedom and such as stumbling after she had been to “voting” without having reportedly read the related “intelligence reports.”

With anticipation building for a great Political Congressional “SMACK DOWN” of a seemingly grossly negligent female Cabinet Officer of the Administration of Barack Hussein Obama:

We have that these matters do relate at least in a sense of “what did she know - when did she know it” queriousness to her inciting and crusading days as FLOTUS Clinton and so to official records of the Administration of the Clintons. 

We have that she being this wrong now suggests she has been quite wrong officially for a while and so much so that we may think it our civic duty to suggest or insist that Congress unseal most of the foreign policy records of the Administration of the Clintons otherwise tucked away for that remaining of secured “privacy” allowances nearly thirty years set.

She is a can of worms that seems already too much OPEN to now not see if President Obama’s “jousting” or not has he and his trusty side kick VP Biden is also of having stepped all in it - all that among it on the sordid trails from the hoofing of the crusading Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton.

Benghazi represents more than a lurking threat of a windmill possessed.  As an “ACT OF WAR” of an ongoing known war it is that President Obama is taggable as of “Playing Politics” and muckraking with his Madam Secretary Clinton as if it could be at most “terrorism.”

{We can leave it to conspiracy theorists to discuss alternative machinations these events could have wrought if Governor Mitt Romney hadn’t quickly stepped in and stemmed a flood of misinformation that probably or just possibly was building.} 

{We can leave it for others to wonder if Bill Clinton with Al Qaeda like “funding” methods now his with his CGI isn’t himself incidentally or accidentally of a “material support of terrorism” if Benghazi rates as “terrorism.”}

The Administration of Barack Hussein Obama seems to have let now - and still seems to be letting still - an “act of war” go unanswered, and, the administration with Madam Secretary Mrs. Clinton seems beset with a now long over due queriousness as per “what did she know - and how long did she know it?”

Earlier during the co-Administration of the Clintons we did let acts of war, like, on embassies go largely un-responded to as of a category of a fog of conflicts of a “terrorism” gray, and, earlier the Clintons could call it “terrorism” for they were avoiding acknowledging their “PEACE” time as actually “WAR” time.

It is wrong for President Obama now to call the events that show, now, as of a gross negligence, by a female Cabinet Officer, and as of her attempts to let them go as if at most “terrorism” and while of further political cover for failures of the co-Administration of the Clintons, as anything now short of still very concerning.

The attacks that killed four under the care and keep charge upon Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton and while of such as one of her “babies” of BOLD “mothering” are best to be called “ACTS OF WAR IN A KNOWN AND ONGOING WAR.”

What did she know?

When did she know it?

Is she just being loyal to spousal plotting and of the “secured” papers of the co-Administration of the Clintons now and of “political” judgements in keeping with a “behavior” of avoiding “intelligence reports” or new counsel of “intelligence”?

Is Hillary Clinton the most POLITICAL Secretary of State our nation has ever had?  How is it that the Administration of Barack Hussein Obama wasn’t “Playing Politics” with events of such as the negligence about Hillary’s BENGHAZI?

Isn’t it that the co-administration of the Clintons essentially seemed to leave President George W. Bush two started games of JENGA?  And, haven’t the Clintons seemed in
unison of like a coy “best wishes” while it seems that they did leave President Bush two towers standing yet each a tower of their own “playing” where he had but only one move left to “play” before two towers would just fall down?

{We can leave it to conspiracy theorists to discuss how annoyed and even paranoid once new President Clinton was when then of a simple self awareness that he had oddly become President without having earned such mantle, and, we can leave it to them that he did express annoyance that his predecessor had “left him a war.” It is better for such to look at how President Clinton may have been petty again and to thinking he (they?) should leave their successor at least one war.}

We have that by the time our Congress may get to giving Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton a due “third degree” or a “whole nine yards” of review for her of a perp walk or cat walk “political” as while the events of 9/11 II have passed too long as considerable and as maybe an unanswered ACT OF WAR.

What is a fair share of blame now for President Barack Hussein Obama?

What is the fair share of blame for Madam Secretary Mrs. Clinton, and, how long its years of incriminations?

What is or is not just a “windmill” to Vice President Joseph Biden?

This is not about Christmas “coal” for a born yesterday “Hillary”!

With the elections now passed we can look back and consider that these of the Administration of Barack Hussein Obama did seemingly get all busy with “Playing Politics” over events in Libya, and, with these elections once so critically set to turn against them if such was allowed out honestly as not “terrorism” - as but acts of war in a warring known and ongoing - but/yet there to fore of having been being politically sold as “GOING WELL” and them of “WINNING.”

Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton has her fair share of documents of their co-Administration of the Clintons’ earlier “official” days, and, Madam Secretary now gives cause to have such reviewed much at least as they that are just of her fair share of secured papers and such likely related to her “politics” about such. 

She did crusade and incite as FLOTUS “Hillary” - and stomp and rant much as if an imperialistic queen irrespective of whose “turf” she was upending.  She has now been of such a BOLD intelligence failure that she seems too institutionalized about such failure as of a consistent and/or persistent other realmness.

These may be just “windmills” to President Barack Hussein Obama and his otherly orderly side kick Vice President Joseph Biden, and, these may be days where they are due a political separation and differentiation from “Hillary” - from Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton, however.

Comments Off
Filed under: POLITICS
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 8:20 am

[This piece original to 7/19/2011]

In memory of Jimmy Stewart, who died that day in 1997, that July 2, 1997 I was near Washington DC on second day of my road trip in my new used 1988 Dodge B 250 Cargo van thinking towards Los Angeles, and Robert Mitchum who had died just the day before:

And, also in memory of all those that died on 9/11/01 as a result of the attacks on the United States of America:

There is no tippy toeing around some basic facts about the history of The United States of America just of the past twenty plus years.  There is much we have been discouraged from considering since 9/11/01 and so much that wasn’t simply of wisdoms of President George W. Bush’s efforts to help our nation heal and stay together.

President Al Gore would not have just been able to “lasso the moon” after 9/11/01 attacks on America - he would have likely gone massively to war against all of Afghanistan and likely accidentally some against Pakistan as well.  He would have been at home with war photographs and likely found the Afghan Conflicts quite picturesque what with his time as a Vietnam Conflict war zone photojournalist, so it seems.

We  have President Obama of the Democrats defensiveness that they would have run the response to 9/11 very differently and heavy from the start in Afghanistan.  We therefore have that President Al Gore would have soon been in Afghanistan with major presence and commitment maybe larger than what President Bush dedicated to Iraq - to Iraq as still of roots about Al Qaeda motivations.

We have some actual political history since 9/11 that shows quite that as politicians go it was Senator Hillary Clinton who benefited more than any other of America’s politicians, politically speaking, due to crisis of GROUND ZERO being her GROUND ZERO and to the (needed?) extreme make-over of former First Lady Hillary Clinton into an untouchable international sympathetic figure with near super power to defy our most established seniority system - our Senate’s seniority system.

Really there is no way to soft shoe around so much that has been left undiscussed for so long while a blaming all about directed at those maybe more innocent.  This still may be a stretch, some, but may be spot on and not just cynical - the Clintons did after 9/11 stop claiming “smartest in the room” status and instead lead with more a: we just did what the American people told us to do - so it is Americans’ fault, not ours, like.  It was near idiotic with a regular “blue states said do this…” and “red states said do that…” grandiose over simplifying by Clintons, with a gross abuse of Bush’s generosity in the interests to see America heal as quickly as possible.

Did President Obama just execute long delayed Democrat Party strategies that would have been President Al Gore’s soon after 9/11 and such that it would be a logical conclusion that President Gore would have also accidently widened the area of conflict also to being at war, some to much with Pakistan?

Much less talked about is how President Bush found that he and his parties dissatisfaction about Saddam Hussein not yet having been fully prosecuted had suddenly and unexpectedly become far more complicated because of attacks on America on 9/11.  President Bush may not have been as dissatisfied with The United States for not having yet brought Saddam Hussein to adequate justice for his invasion of Kuwait, at least, as Osama bin Laden likely was - and was since his founding of Al Qaeda specifically with designs to see that Saddam Hussein was treated accordingly for his invasion of a sovereign neighbor.

Again it is still quite remarkable that for all these years it has been little discussed that Senator Hillary Clinton did politically benefit the most from 9/11 as American Politicians go.  She not only got out from nearly all oppression a junior Senator was expected to be subject to under our famed seniority system there, but she also got the complete and international make-over as suddenly as a sympathetic figure ready to be President, as a political untouchable of sorts.

I didn’t make it to Los Angeles as expected with such road trip to be first step to moving to Hollywood - I turned around after a couple weeks in New Orleans due to delays from needing a rebuilt engine installation.  I did decide then about that moving nearer to all fifty states would be better and so was to my move to Washington DC in early 1998.

But, you know, today is a day to talk about responsible budgeting, right?  Today therefore is a day to talk about how dangerous the Clintons’ surplus of their removing spending commitments about near a trillion of available revenue actually was.  President Al Gore would have just as soon found out such too though with most of unpaid wars and reversals of Clintons’ surpluses being for him only about Pakistan and Afghanistan as a new Vietnam - an “it is Vietnam all over again” even.

That he would have been providing the pictures and the wars as a former war photographer and photo journalist may have quickly become a concern, but that is hard to say for sure.  President Gore would have been again a Gore covering war gore, though unavoidably.  Senator Hillary Clinton might then only have taken second to President Gore as Politician that gained the most politically speaking due to crisis of 9/11/01 attacks on America that Clintons’ surpluses may have facilitated with their gross and rash unfunding/underfunding to a surplus, excessive without a doubt, near a trillion.

What we can say with confidence now seeing how the Democrats meant to likely have managed Al Qaeda from day one seems to be that Afghanistan and Pakistan would have been near as expensive today as Afghanistan, Iraq, and now Pakistan have been.  We at least would have had all the same stories about a President having to go to war without our armed forces having sufficient vehicle armor and body armor, and much more maybe as a political discussion about “irresponsible” and “dangerous” Clintons’ surpluses.

Now the Clintons did move quickly and broadly to stop asserting they were like the “smartest in the room” and did so move to a full blaming of 9/11 on the American people - on people who they had simply let spread their ignorance about global affairs, unlearned about such, with acceptance by Clintons as their “executive” decisions - of a simple lie that they had just done what the American people had told them to do and so without using any of their smarts bragged about earlier as “qualifications” for such offices.

Gosh, we missed all this just because Al Gore wasn’t actually elected President, well maybe not all of it.  The Clintons’ surplus likely would have been a real political problem for a President Gore too, and more so with he a former war photo journalist now trying to provide the pictures and the “conflicts.”  We likely wouldn’t be now suggesting Bush had no real reason to suddenly and decisively contradict the Clintons’ recent intelligence issued to justify PEACE DIVIDENDS before their time, and so much else of their irresponsible unfunding and underfunding with their removal of liberal spending, near a full trillion, while funds were readily available and not necessarily of times with justifications for deficit spending.

And so now how about “Mr. Gore Goes To Afghanistan” as a treatment of what currently ails our general budgeting?  How about Saddam Hussein and the real Arab Spring that must have been of intelligence quieted to de-emphasized by Clintons’ White House just to justify their PEACE DIVIDENDS? 

Did the Clintons together use the CIA to lie about PEACE in their times?

And, what the heck would President Al Gore have done about problems still festering with Saddam Hussein not adequately prosecuted for so many known and maybe unknown, as yet, war crimes and crimes against his people and their humanity?  And what about the origins of Al Qaeda as described as first organized to offer a way to bring Saddam Hussein to sufficient justice?

Oh, yeh and what about Iran today if we hadn’t gotten around to prosecuting Saddam Hussein? “Justice for Saddam Hussein” was quite the rally cry that most raised the insurgency we now call Al Qaeda, right?  Oh, yeh:  Wouldn’t Iraq now be in a nuclear power and arms race with Iran if President George Bush hadn’t moved to the albeit late prosecution of Saddam Hussien?

Comments Off
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 12:31 pm

However type cast or type set you consider yourself to be these days are days to hope you can be towards a better self - right?

It is a broached new year of the Year of the Founder’s Lord two thousand Ten & four and aren’t we all to wonder if yet still we can hope? The future belongs to the children — the future is of our duty to try to be prepared, however, and yet common in a goal to attempt to leave things better than we generally found them.  To not be too utopian or philosophically esoteric in a caved parlance maybe we should picture President Clinton with a shovel, and President Obama also with a shovel.

We are imprisoned in a proffered ignorance long shafted by the Democrat party in a playing of politics self defensive for its elites by scooping and heaving.  It is a mind bending paradigm to be battled - battled past the too long and too entrenched trenchant much of the political shovels at CYA VIP prioritized ranked lines.  There is hardly a possible peace in the ranks of the Democrat party as the rivalry upends anew between the Houses Clinton & Obama.

What do President Clinton and President Obama have in common - in common besides the Ladie’d Secretary’d Mrs. Clinton?  Is the general discord and undermined Welfare of just the past two decades now considerable as for what the houses Clinton & Obama had in common or more for how they rivaled?  Literally speaking is it that for however they “shoveled” a ideologic, particularly, Hillary Rodham Clinton has been now in black and white read all over much neither as a Helen nor a Penelope?

President Obama is self described in his early memoirs as having been keen to punk rock poets.  It so then seems odd how punk’d at times he has seemed to have become by that as rivaling Clintons.  Somehow it is that President Obama has stoked a fog over times now two to four decades otherwise historical.  However incensed or stoked his pre and post toking and smoking patchworks he is like too many stuck under a rough quilting kaleidoscoped of the House of Clinton “housekeeping” of Mrs. Hillary Clinton.

President Obama may nearly have punk’d himself when of his early memoir and likewise nearly to professing himself as a “pro-communist” by associated nearly of punk rock poets and storied about those with the COMMUNIST MANIFESTO.  This though today is tuned to be more of a hope for President Obama and not a burying of him by his own punking of himself, however whence.  He though seems to have established himself at “shovel ready” for digging the “hole” deeper, and deeper.

An admitted historical of Barack Hussein Obama is that he was like born a Soviet Studies LOVE CHILD of a pepper and salt - ebony and ivory - foreign and domestic.  It is an educational tale, his, how he was born in a shared commitment to get the communist thought and understanding correct per its proffering.  There may be, if permitted some lay psycho-babble, no heaven or unburdened existential for our President as it seems that for he to get to his “happy place” he has to think and work to a world yet similar to that which united in studies his parents.

In a scary lay psycho-babble it is concerning that we have missed more than what seems promised as revelations by DUTY by former Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates - it is scary that for President Barack Hussein Obama it may have been Oedipal and quite complex that as Secretary of State Mrs. Clinton could fill a jonesing Oedipal for a elderly white mother figure penchant his. 

Again, yet however type cast or type set you consider yourself in this now the Year of the Founder’s Lord two thousand Ten and four we need be concerned of/for a stoked fog generally of the Body Democrat and specifically as particular to the Houses Clinton & Obama.

It seems they have been offering token fixes and yet it seems more historical that they have been imprisoning too many by the CYA VIP elite scooping and heaving and as “shovel ready” much only of President Clinton & President Obama at rivaling in digging deeper and deeper despite general hopes for a Welfare of a Posterity and Tranquility for the children at least secured from the blessings of Liberty more tunedly perfect forward heaved and ho’ed.

President Clinton and President Obama have stoked a fog generally of an impossible economics and as a too political economics.  There is little separating Socialism ideologic from their positing as ideologues.  Their Mount Olympus nectar yet like a Cool Aid concoction for autocracy more than democracy - albeit too not dissimilar as mashed Socialism elitism.

However type cast or type set you consider yourself to be these days are days to hope you can be towards a better self - right?

So now about the economics and politics yet possible for a better general Welfare existentialism forward - at least yet as out of and away from the Houses Clinton & Obama heaving and ho’ing deeper and deeper:  Has the economy been doomed ever since the first shovel fulls of Clinton Diplomacy so circa 1993?  Have we been doomed these two decades for decisions that are now more historically rendered as having been “too political” and specifically of and by the House of Clinton?

We can now all get stoked to a cutting of the fog long wafting from token liberalism and too effected Socialism at least in an anticipatory by a distance like as of a fantasy league.  It is not babble to posit that had Senator John Sidney McCain III and Governor Sarah Heath Palin been elected in 2008 the economies would have been securable from these current depths.  No really!!!  McCain/Palin offered a more realistic way/path/tao whence that would have liberated a kinetic economic statist not Statist tunage that would have meshed with the vicissitudes incident to life as postulated by President George Washington in his first inaugural.  [It is socially intriguing that the First President of The United States of America did seem to allude to prophylactic use as for a healthy economy of ups and downs incident to live as secured Constitutionally.  It is intriguing that Washington waxed a like ‘wash/rinse/reuse’ washing metaphor for his People in his first inaugural for what was then the cutting edge condoms of his day.]

However now you want to skin either the House of Clinton or Obama or either of generally as Democrat Party established or Republican Party NEW HOPES it is that the economies have been doomed by a General welfare improper interpretation of preambled keyed “general Welfare” basis.  As President George Washington promised the Jewish of the Newport, Rhode Island concerned regulars tolerance we have to figure that despite his vicissitudes prefacing he too meant for his People to be tolerant also of Catholics.

You can think yourself to how you have been imprisoned by the Liberal “economics” and now are of them of hoping to be yet loved even though much of a culpability for imprisoning you and most, economically.  It is like, now, that you could be seriously at risk of an incurable Stockholm Syndrome as by then hands long of the shafting by the heaving and ho’ing both of the Houses of Clinton & Obama.

There can be little or no hope for a restoration to a pathology to a more perfect Union as long as we naively keep liking these Democrats while they essentially prove themselves still too shovel ready at digging deeper and deeper.  We need to be guarded and prudent to inoculate ourselves from more politics at a teasing of income equality that forthwith primarily is figured as an expedited politics for a refreshment of nectar serving stores for a VIP Party elite at attempts to secure themselves a Mount Olympus, albeit however yet seemingly more as too a Socialist political protectorate.

We need to inoculate ourselves from this that seems a willful attempt to render unto the People an effective trapping as if of a Stockholm Syndrome loving of those that did engirth them too much in a Socialist phat promise all the while their too political economics moved more just lower and lower.

Knowledge is power! - it has been said so.  Is their heaven your hell?  Is their banking reform your inequality?  Is your best path now yet to avoid the Cool Aid and promises teased of their “income inequality” new path?

However type cast or type set you consider yourself to be these days are days to hope you can be towards a better self - right?

A tune you can carry and march forwards now, yet - yet despite how it may seem politically of a counter cultural, seems to be that had McCain/Palin triumphed for American arching per Washington bolstering in furtherence Constitutional of federalism prudence however yet moderated to a Jeffersonian democratic republican we could have seen the economic depths be countered by statism in ways the Obama New Nationalism Statism as otherwise just lowered and lowered so many as by a falling tides at lowering all boats.

A tune you can carry and march forwards now is that by the Houses of Clinton & Obama the USG has been too primarily at politics at a politicized economics of establishments to telling people what they should or should not buy.

Had McCain/Palin had a victory march such would have just started a restorative beat to release a stored economic energy for new growth in a economic primed towards the contrary economic condition of actual hope - a hope that is of a free market that stays established for people being free to buy what they want to buy, and secured in a moral capitalism basis towards betterment from work — from working at being better and to new and higher greater detail and detailed habits. 

                                             *     *     *

[I speak politically and economically here knowing of what I could have continued at that then became like “disloyal” and “revolting” whence the House of Obama commenced its top down economics of dictates per preferences.  I speak here knowing what I likely could have opened up economically by 2009 that should have meshed with a statist President McCain and for a rapid restorative economic growth energy.]

Comments Off
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 1:13 pm
For any modern discussion of economics we must in a bi-partisan/non-partisan/cross-partisan be to spinning beyond TRICKLE DOWN ECONOMICS.  We are stuck now as commenced to a new #MoralCapitalism of a rejoined humanity in #MoralMan historicals much and quite mostly for #UrbanMoralisms.  Thanks to Martin Luther, however of a BE BOLD IN YOUR SINS, some may have taken past liberties in cruelty expectant that the day was then that even so so they could and would be forgiven.

It is that a morality is what has stewed better progress for Secretary Kerry than for Secretary Clinton.  Since Madam Secretary is inseparable from Bill Clinton’s commitment to her, as recalled, that preceded a fidelity in marriage arrangement with their prior necessary condition to marriage of that he would promise that she would get her own Presidency after he got his, there is a forgivable possible and a forgivable not appropriate for a candidate or just historical Hillary Rodham Clinton;  Mrs. Clinton cannot run yet for 2016 as if of a Christian forgiveness granted daily so that each day she can be like just a lawyer with new cases — the Clintons do have a running con - a decades long operable plan for the election of her that as a still kept plan greater than each of her/our days is such of a aura than should not and cannot be overlooked or of a forgiveness sponsoring.  She is white - she is white collar - she may deserved being a white collared even if by an establishment morality separate from a State as a white collared posse.

President Barack Hussein Obama is a conundrum for historicals in economics.  It is hard to say he has a philosophy of governance nor any “economics” his own but that of spend, spend, spend & tax & tax reset of old “tax & spend” that if Mrs. Clinton otherwise had been electable too would have been of a politically necessary to render herself of at too as Senators Obama & Clinton did make nearly all the same campaign promises.  It is here ridiculous to try to relate to any TRICKLE DOWN ECONOMICS and especially if to be of a political spin doctoring attempt to show them in a possibly more moral light.  It is ridiculous otherwise too now to much discuss TRICKLE DOWN ECONOMICS just because the marketing and pop culture of these days are not of the era of such economics and are not sustainable or supportive to a harmonics or synthesis currently.  I propose that we now are to a new economics paradigm of at least a soft science discerning that can be responsibly tagged as a SUPPOSITORY & DEPOSITORY ECONOMICS.

A discussion of a SUPPOSITORY ECONOMICS vs. a DEPOSITORY ECONOMICS is seemingly apropos for these current social dynamics of the micro or macro and the local or global.  A discussion and development of a general understanding and furtherance of quantifiable and applicable discourse though may be good for setting us forward back to at least a decade of growth economics yet while it seems that such cannot fare well for President Obama nor other so yet set other leading Democrats.  It seems that we can focus how the Democrats in mass basically have been failing economically much because they have been lacking the understanding that should be generally solidified if and when to a full and detailed expose of that to do justice to it as a better and new economics as of SUPPOSITORY & DEPOSITORY ECONOMICS.

It can be said to be generally acceptable that President Obama did not rightly place the blame for the said “economics” he “inherited.”  It can be said that politically President Obama trapped himself from a better economics by being from day one of a politics of covering up how much of the collapsing of economies was rooted and nurtured essentially of Clintonomics and the general political administering of the co-Presidency of the Clintons.  The entire time since President Obama started off his first term with lies to the economics in play embedded and orated in his First Inaugural he has been of arresting any potential he may have had otherwise than has yet been demonstrable.  The Democrats in mass have been of an immorality in their governance by ways of lies about the causals most significant to the problemas.  They have only succeeded in pushing a “morality” agenda by a politics immoral as of them of falsely accusing and wrongly tagging the actual historical politics and economics.

Whom of white collars can be a posse?  We if again to a growth economics need be not of a said old and tired SUPPLY SIDE and/or TRICKLE DOWN now.  To be anew to a #MoralCapitalism we need to recognize we are not limited to the old Cold War Era prudent obedience to a TOP down guidance of/with assurities by Government that one’s commerce wouldn’t be accidentally treasonous.  The world is decidedly more flat now.  The politics of a charge of liberatings in new federalism have become a global normative.  We of America are of establishments that do quite require that an establishment morality exists separate from the State just so that the State can have a chance at operating morally.

It of us to a new economics as by ways of discerning as SUPPOSITORY & DEPOSITORY ECONOMICS is also necessarily of a historical setting to an affecting that Democrats have not understood the socio - nor economics of their days so charged in its administering.  The world is decidedly more flat now.  The politics of a new economics need not be of SUPPLY SIDE nor TRICKLE DOWN old Cold War era prudence that did much synch with the marketing and advertising harmonics whence.  A new establishment economics can be of how the Democrats missed there were two economics to govern about while proffering their irresponsible climate and economic sciences —we have long been of a complex economics that is said of people playing games in the economies, however justified as if a hobby in doing God’s work, as by supposing things as possible and potential, and, we have long been to while so of such in our economics of the core of the “moral”in the “humanity” of commerce and governance of the more permanent socio-economic of people living only by what they did deposit as of the economics of subsistence more nearly.

A ripe fruit as a conundrum a problema as a prolegomena for prima facia for SUPPOSITORY vs. DEPOSITORY ECONOMICS is the unforgivable socio per the Clintons of the commitment keeping by Bill Clinton of his promise that Mrs. Clinton if she agreed to become his bride would have his fidelity at least to keeping his promise that she would get her own Presidency after he got his.  [This is of a historical of my own experience and knowledge of the Clintons which dates to the early 1970s.]  The plans and plots of the Clinton “two-fer” is mostly a running con that asks that they be of a Christian forgiveness fresh start each day from so many without any consideration that such is dominant and unforgivable.  It is bad enough for any economics that the Clintons are both lawyered/esquired (still?) and of a politics of playing at governance as if even in the charges they are the lawyers and of the adage “the client goes to jail” not the lawyer, and as they are each other’s lawyer firstly and protected spousally from incriminating the other and all the while they like to ask the People to let them forget their own hands/culpability each day as if by being lawyers each day is just a new case and a blank slate in “professional” plausible deniability for them.

But this needn’t be so personal while the historical record still needs to be settled more correctly for the Clintons and President Obama’s year of administering as self arrested from a greater HOPE and POTENTIAL by his handcuffing of his presidency so with his most affecting cover-up cons for the Clintons on a presumption that their party needed the same protection for an associated guilt with the much unknown seeming husbandry of a most selfish and spousally set Clinton political machinations.  The economics of these years of administering by the Obama administration are and have been corrupted.  It is more considerable for any now beholden towards a morality reset for a renewed #MoralCapitalism though that the economics of the Clintons and Obama administration have missed the complexity of the real world economics as of a gaming and subsistence - a supposing and deposits limited - a SUPPOSITORY vs. DEPOSITORY.

For now I have broached a discourse on a better and new economics science tagging — I will apply now some empathy receptors towards a further consideration and to an end that a SUPPOSITORY & DEPOSITORY ECONOMICS can now mesh with the Laffer Curve logistics and yet be a different from and more time and place responsive adjusted socio-economic lingua.

In future elaborations we can discuss the old vs. new as the Cold War and current geo-politics respective of the Russian Federation and Iran.  There is a necessary consideration to be worked through of President Putin as a Russian Orthodox Christian and of his engagements now in Syria and Iran affairs.  Russia has rebuilt the grand Cathedral that Stalin tore asunder to make a permanent like monument to himself for the ages and his “governance.”  Iran has cause to, however long of alliances with Russian powers, be firstly if to nuclear weapons to be of a morality that is considerate that “Russians” are due a targeting firstly and much before Americans or whomever otherwise of past opposing coalitions.

For any tagging of SUPPOSITORY & DEPOSITORY ECONOMICS to hold up and as if learned such much must be applicable to a considerate historical at least as per Afghanistan and too how if the United States had not helped defeat the moves of expansionist communism/socialism by the old U.S.S.R. whence today Iran could too be just a satellite Soviet subject region.

                                             *     *     *

{I wasn’t going to be expansive or historical to the early 90s recession recovery considerations but then today in 11:30 to Noon slot on The History Channel a short on Nelson Mandela confirmed an upside down of the politics and economics of the early 90s I had been considering but not meaning to also diss.  Of that of my economic thought and efforts of said pre-Clinton Clinton 90s recovery architecture is much that I was essentially to musing and synching a counter culture marking that was of an empathy for the more real economics as upside down as it was that the people at the thought bottom were then more relaxed and having more fun than the said “rich” of the top.  As per the Mandela documentary short they aired how he saw that the whites could be saved from themselves as a ticket forward his/theirs.  There is though I was annoyed by the Nobel Prize for Economics circa near 1992 and then later also annoyed that my architecture that was meant to be played with a complexity of at least a first part and then a needed second moderated differently second part had those like of he of the Nobel prize whence also apprised from earlier of my “marketing” for “economics” then stuck and ignorant of the second part and so that I was never able to also influence such via the remainder of my considerations in economics and positive change politics.} 

Comments Off