[The following is original to CitRB.com 2/19/2013]
We can conclude later that President Obama has corned himself politically with a gridlock of and from his own absolutes.
To be brief, and yet poignant, while a hashable audience is e-assembled, for social media networking, and physically organized gathered as a #smw ecosystem:
We have that these days of President Obama as re-elected with a mandate for austerity and gridlock have us stuck much because of some of these works of the Administration of the Clintons:
If he were to trying to actually sell and effect a new growth economy wouldn’t he necessarily be about a different politics?
It figures that President Obama now owns the down economy and that enough may now be realizing that the Democrats actually did far more to cause the economic downturn than even President Bush’s tax cuts.
Many can easily fathom how to twain a marking of blame upon the Clintons for their eight years after they get over the first condemned bridge about the Clintons’ SURPLUSES as of a trillion in cuts that neither our Government nor our economy needed.
It is hard to avoid speaking of dangers from political ABSOLUTES now for there is so much that relates almost solely economically and politically just to the workings of the Administration of the Clintons. Obama has cornered himself with his ABSOLUTE “It is all Bush’s fault!” Or, the Clintons trapped newly elected President Obama with an insistence that he should go again with “WE’RE RIGHT - THEY’RE WRONG” absolutism.
President William Jefferson Clinton knew enough to be aware that he shouldn’t have proceeded with a SURPLUS while he pursued his risky loan housing bubble economic plans as an unfunded Federal social program. Those two political items should not ever be able to work together or well co-exist.
The Clintons messed up our economics by rigging succession schemes for Hillary to be set up to be asap elected to return them to our Executive seat of “holding of office” of our Office of the President. There are historical moments to consider as our economy is stuck with a jobless recovery much still that precisely rest about the workings of the Administration of the Clintons.
The Clintons’ SURPLUSES could go down as the greatest economic and/or political blunder of THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA of at least the past century. We had no economic or governmental need for that cutting of an additional trillion in cuts past the trillion the GOP found to cut (too quickly) to balance our Federal budget.
The SURPLUSES linger in these down economic times of us much still in the “ditch” yet hardly as critically as they should. To understand the SURPLUSES it helps to consider the scheming to successionary Power by the Clintons to as much as possible set Hillary up to asap return them to such seat of Powers for the both of them again. It is critical that you do not accept or believe the innocent portrayal of Hillary Clinton as in the book or movie GAME CHANGE for she and Bill were of dating compatibility while at Yale Law School because they both wanted to be elected President. She did not only after becoming “Senator Hillary Clinton” get to thinking she might want to be President herself and as from people having suggested the idea firstly to her.
The Clintons’s SURPLUSES now sit in a lacking safety about a media and politics too hesitant to consider them as contrary and conflicting to the very New Deal spending ideology of President Obama. It seems as if there are two absolutes that do not and cannot fit together now still to propped up and marketed as if somehow they are actually compatible. The Clintons stood up an unnecessary cutting of an additional trillion while there was no economic need for a surplus, and, President Obama stands up suggesting so much they said we didn’t need to spend even a trillion on is now actually necessary spending.
There are many condemned levies and roads and bridges and even schools that the Clintons took away available Federal dollars from. In the case of Katrina and the failure of the Mississippi River Gulf Outlet (MR GO) their surpluses fit with the court’s finding of “gross negligence” upon our Federal Government to a date back to 1983 most negligently morally speaking on the legacy of the Administration of the Clintons for them of cutting money by a trillion for a political popularity from a SURPLUS thought most impossible and while it was not necessary economically nor for governance purposes.
We have it nearly as a truth self evident after past the first condemned bridge left to collapse by the Clintons’ SURPLUSES that it cannot have been as ABSOLUTE as President Obama decried with “IT IS ALL BUSH’S FAULT!”
The greatest economic threat if not just the most dangerous moral threat is that the Clintons’ SURPLUSES were only “necessary” politically to save a queen like plotted and schemed succession workings towards a President Hillary Clinton. The Clintons needed to politically save themselves and their vast plotting too near to a reach at global autocratic power after the GOP proved that they could find a trillion in cuts to safely balance our Federal budget. The Clintons would not have been able to sell anyone on more years for either of them then for their second term if they couldn’t prove that they too could find a thought impossible trillion to also cut.
Hillary Clinton much deserves the rapped tag as the “TRILLION DOLLA’ SURPLUS’D QUEEN” in poem/rap FUZZY MATH available at http://jphogan.org and where originally streamed and published via http://citizenrosebud.us.
President Clinton and Senate Banking chieftain Dodd are oddly remembered for having asked a small gaggle of banking heads to find a way to “gamble away” the known and/or expected risks inherent in Bill Clinton’s desire to be most popular by coyly burning our economic candle from both ends at once. You can call it “a ditch” or that “it burned out” as expected - seemingly.
It is absolutely not now funny that President Obama’s Obamacare ACA was fronted as not meant to cover illegal immigrants while now of he of an immigration proposal that would have them all by their conservative estimate of 12 million to be fully covered it seems as citizens by about the time his Obamacare however costed otherwise is to then be in effect on the promises and predictions about it as affordable without these 12 million covered as well.
Only the Clintons needed the Clintons’ SURPLUSES of them also to a finding of a thought impossible trillion in cuts. Without matching the GOP efforts of the balancing of our budget their scheming and effecting to line Hillary up would have been bust. These are the same Clintons who cut a trillion in liew of spending on immigration reforms as well.
The Clintons’ SURPLUSES did take away the pipeline of Federal Government spending that needed the 4-7 year headstart to have kept enough employment in our economy for the risky lending housing bubble as run yet as their unfunded Federal social program. The timing of such is nearly enough self evident now though hardly the political absolute it should rank with while incidentally chronological to a set up for economic collapse about 2006 or 2007. It is that to have seen the housing not collapse the “shovel ready” jobs had to not have been cut by the Clintons’s SURPLUSES during their second term so that they would have been already processed and in the works with all necessary permitting for the “economics” then needed after the Clintonomics of stirring a hyper-consumerism ran the length of its short wick.
It is that President Obama is the President now maybe most trapped by ABSOLUTES of his own orations. But that said it is absolutely a real concern that the Clintons were offered political protection like of a “WE’RE RIGHT - THEY’RE WRONG” polarizing political partisanship then quite only able to lead to gridlock. But with these shared it is important to really consider how absolutely correct I am in sharing that the Clintons were the only ones that needed the SURPLUSES and politically to save a succession scheming to line Hillary up for an inevitable anointing more as if a “queen.”
We have all long been paying too high a price for the SUPLUSES of the Clintons. And it is absolutely contradictory that the Clintons can be economically right for so much cutting, and that President Obama can yet be so right for wanting to spend so much once cut as unnecessary as if it is still necessary.
The Clintons’ SURPLUSES do deserve to go down in history as one of our greatest national economic blunders of the past century. President Clinton did know enough to know he shouldn’t have pursued surpluses and his risky lending programs with his Clintonomics of a pimped out hyper-consumerism — but resisting temptations (political) is historically of record a characteristic not as of a “strong suit.”
A while ago while being a partisan political operator against his promises to operate his CGI as non-partisan and non-political he in an interview with Maria Bartiromo proffered an “expertise” about economies needing time to recover science that by his own words and phraseology if actually an “expert”, and if such affirms he was an expert while President, did condemn himself as knowingly having been of doing what he knew he economically shouldn’t have done while President.
Beyond this we are of a 2013 as much needing a pop trending for key word relevance about “capitalism” and “socialism” still. We though need to find a way to break down the ABSOLUTES of and by President Obama to get to the realistic realm of “cost consciousness” - this is needed as we also need to really discuss tax reforms, and still immigration.