The simplest way to preface, in a more scientific way, the post 2009 “I inherited this …” is to maybe look at what happened to the price of gasoline due to Al Gore as Mr. Alarming Science of GLOBAL WARMING ALARMISM. We should look carefully at such subjective politicking not so much with a debate about the “warming” so much as we should reconsider and look at how many other options were actually available then, economically speaking, to address or fix such if so.
It would be too simple to be stupid, quite, though to speak of this now as all Al Gore’s fault with he responsible most for a over-simplified dramatization devoid of objectivism that was far too alarming to our economics and markets - even to the very fabric of our sociologicals. We shouldn’t look at this forced austerity of us so nearly of a new depression as just the fault of Al Gore.
We have it as well to be measured reasonably that when Senator Hillary Clinton announced “Hillary for President” she did tear asunder much about our national sense - its historic prudence and modesty. For now it is more important though just to focus on how besides the subjective alarmism of GLOBAL WARMING over dramatization we have quite that “Hillary for President” and her revolutionary pronouncement to be to seizing all oil company profits after elected still as a quite evident causal factor too.
These are the hundred days, give or take, that try our souls anew. There may be no Holy Trinity in candidate Mitt Romney’s understanding of the original sins that brought us necessarily to this forced New Deal Austerity. It may be some a putting of the chicken before the egg now to have already punctuated this analysis as a “forced New Deal Austerity.”
There is mystery about the politics of our time - yet less about how there were more ways to address an actual GLOBAL WARMING or CLIMATE CHANGE than the few partisan and quite political offerings yet embraced by Democrats.
There is a mystery, sure, about how Candidate Mitt Romney may not be to seeing a Holy Trinity in this, but then really how mysterious is it that it seems to have been a conspiracy or just mess of four - of the four we know of as Al Gore, Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Former candidate of “Hillary for President”, and, as well candidate and now President Barack Hussein Obama?
For the sake of simplicity it might be more dramatic and yet easier to fathom as per these trying days of our O’s zone to consider the about four as of a collusion and conspiracy as if an un-Holy trinity meant to be kept mysterious if only by always allowing a deniability for one of its primary bad actors.
We didn’t have to embrace the over dramatized subjective alarmism of GLOBAL WARMING ALARMISM as the end all be all of political solutions to scientific problems. We have engineers - we had other ways to build a solution already available and quite well funded. We didn’t need the socialistic pronouncement of “Hillary for President” by candidate Senator Clinton to hawkish bend orated to us of a time where Americans should have their Government seize “all oil company profits.”
As to this “un-Holy trinity” we can see the workings of their hands towards a crisis upon a crisis to a much higher price for gasoline so that their idealism could have a chance to have political feet if only for a brief early atmosphere of acquiescence while stuck in a fog of the partisan polarizing storm fronts - we can see a simple mashable “taggable” for them as of a responsibility specifically for the spike in gas prices that then set off the collapse of the housing bubble once the hyper-consumerism that Speaker Pelosi long defended, with her hard to explain belief in the Clintons’ SURPLUSES, as it did have people not able to also afford their mortgages if they did afford the new gas prices needed to get to the very job that they had only because the “hyper-consumerism” of Clintonomics wasn’t yet quite of people actually of spending too much more than they actually had an ability to afford. It became simply and quickly a decision for many to either pay for gas to get to work or to pay their mortgage.
Thanks to Senator Clinton, Senator Obama, Speaker Pelosi and their alarmist idealist Al Gore and his preaching of at least bad and limited political solutions amidst his questionable “science” and moral priorities, for his people, where so many seemed meant to see themselves as less important than the terra firma about them, we now have them much more clearly as culpable for politics as of an un-Holy trinity that did cause the price of gas to spike and therefore were mostly those of the original political sins that caused the economy to go belly up once the funds needed for gas had become the same funds only available for mortgage payments or maintenance of the risky hyper-consumerism ushered in knowingly by President Bill Clinton.
We certainly had numerous other ways for a new doctrine political for climate concerns. We didn’t need to blindly rush to a unfounded faith in the over-dramatized preaching by Al Gore and while it so devoid of objectivism. We had ways to add new industries as for a prudent mobilization maybe still too nationalistic that wouldn’t have been so as under a faith in this un-Holy trinity to the same mistakes (?) so to a mass austerity as was already undisputed evident truth in Spain with it known not unknown that such if spread to America so would as well cost two regular jobs for each new “green” politically figured job.
We may all now be so globally of a New Deal Austerity specifically because of this “O” zone or bad science and polarizing idealistic partisan politics where we were told to accept the few offered Democrat Party solutions and not at all stray to consider so many other options that were then also available and even so that we could have been to addressing “CLIMATE CHANGE” by adding jobs in new industries without killing off existing jobs.
What we know now is that we actually had time to consider other options and to better arrange a new believable economic path forward. We see now there are many holes in the very thinking of the Democrat Party un-Holy trinity however amassed and yet too few are yet to the very simple causal fact based awakening that could even be enlightening since it seems straight talk sharable that the Democrats caused the spike in gas prices that set off the otherwise forced NEW DEAL AUSTERITY.
It seems an “Ah!” or “O - Oh!” “MOMENT” now with us all within a hundred days to save our nation.
Please consider this alarmism - and fully. Please reconsider all recent “CRISIS” based “alarmism” and especially as well the indefensible faith Speaker Pelosi kept and keeps, it seems, in the Clintons’ SURPLUSES and especially towards a personal enlightenment from a new way of thinking economically and not too subjectively that acknowledges at least three so of a un-Holy trinity, politically speaking, too long, now, for sure, where too many were asked to accept blindly that if she said the extra trillion of cuts by the Clinton First Couple “two-fer” political machinations were good then they must be good.
I don’t know what with all the “devil in the details” about all this politics whom of this Democrat Party trinity to deniability we might or should redraw and toss from quarters first in at least our thoughts. It seems they let it be written and let it be so that we now all be so much to a forced NEW DEAL AUSTERITY even though we can all fairly still question how sinful such may be for it seemingly long of a designed machination and effort worked while such were thinking they could just blame someone or more else.
Yes, we know how to make ice - for starters. Yes, some entrepreneurs were quickly innovative upon the above alarmism however unfounded to inventions of collectors that could be made cheaply and located discretely at congestion points to capture and store the bad carbon based exhausts.
It seems we had ways to pace our nation without such politics about a CLIMATE CHANGE forward without killing off old carbon based jobs so aggressively. It seems we had others with whom we could have kept faith, and sounder economics.
[The following is original to CitRB.com 2/19/2013]
We can conclude later that President Obama has corned himself politically with a gridlock of and from his own absolutes.
To be brief, and yet poignant, while a hashable audience is e-assembled, for social media networking, and physically organized gathered as a #smw ecosystem:
We have that these days of President Obama as re-elected with a mandate for austerity and gridlock have us stuck much because of some of these works of the Administration of the Clintons:
If he were to trying to actually sell and effect a new growth economy wouldn’t he necessarily be about a different politics?
It figures that President Obama now owns the down economy and that enough may now be realizing that the Democrats actually did far more to cause the economic downturn than even President Bush’s tax cuts.
Many can easily fathom how to twain a marking of blame upon the Clintons for their eight years after they get over the first condemned bridge about the Clintons’ SURPLUSES as of a trillion in cuts that neither our Government nor our economy needed.
It is hard to avoid speaking of dangers from political ABSOLUTES now for there is so much that relates almost solely economically and politically just to the workings of the Administration of the Clintons. Obama has cornered himself with his ABSOLUTE “It is all Bush’s fault!” Or, the Clintons trapped newly elected President Obama with an insistence that he should go again with “WE’RE RIGHT - THEY’RE WRONG” absolutism.
President William Jefferson Clinton knew enough to be aware that he shouldn’t have proceeded with a SURPLUS while he pursued his risky loan housing bubble economic plans as an unfunded Federal social program. Those two political items should not ever be able to work together or well co-exist.
The Clintons messed up our economics by rigging succession schemes for Hillary to be set up to be asap elected to return them to our Executive seat of “holding of office” of our Office of the President. There are historical moments to consider as our economy is stuck with a jobless recovery much still that precisely rest about the workings of the Administration of the Clintons.
The Clintons’ SURPLUSES could go down as the greatest economic and/or political blunder of THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA of at least the past century. We had no economic or governmental need for that cutting of an additional trillion in cuts past the trillion the GOP found to cut (too quickly) to balance our Federal budget.
The SURPLUSES linger in these down economic times of us much still in the “ditch” yet hardly as critically as they should. To understand the SURPLUSES it helps to consider the scheming to successionary Power by the Clintons to as much as possible set Hillary up to asap return them to such seat of Powers for the both of them again. It is critical that you do not accept or believe the innocent portrayal of Hillary Clinton as in the book or movie GAME CHANGE for she and Bill were of dating compatibility while at Yale Law School because they both wanted to be elected President. She did not only after becoming “Senator Hillary Clinton” get to thinking she might want to be President herself and as from people having suggested the idea firstly to her.
The Clintons’s SURPLUSES now sit in a lacking safety about a media and politics too hesitant to consider them as contrary and conflicting to the very New Deal spending ideology of President Obama. It seems as if there are two absolutes that do not and cannot fit together now still to propped up and marketed as if somehow they are actually compatible. The Clintons stood up an unnecessary cutting of an additional trillion while there was no economic need for a surplus, and, President Obama stands up suggesting so much they said we didn’t need to spend even a trillion on is now actually necessary spending.
There are many condemned levies and roads and bridges and even schools that the Clintons took away available Federal dollars from. In the case of Katrina and the failure of the Mississippi River Gulf Outlet (MR GO) their surpluses fit with the court’s finding of “gross negligence” upon our Federal Government to a date back to 1983 most negligently morally speaking on the legacy of the Administration of the Clintons for them of cutting money by a trillion for a political popularity from a SURPLUS thought most impossible and while it was not necessary economically nor for governance purposes.
We have it nearly as a truth self evident after past the first condemned bridge left to collapse by the Clintons’ SURPLUSES that it cannot have been as ABSOLUTE as President Obama decried with “IT IS ALL BUSH’S FAULT!”
The greatest economic threat if not just the most dangerous moral threat is that the Clintons’ SURPLUSES were only “necessary” politically to save a queen like plotted and schemed succession workings towards a President Hillary Clinton. The Clintons needed to politically save themselves and their vast plotting too near to a reach at global autocratic power after the GOP proved that they could find a trillion in cuts to safely balance our Federal budget. The Clintons would not have been able to sell anyone on more years for either of them then for their second term if they couldn’t prove that they too could find a thought impossible trillion to also cut.
Hillary Clinton much deserves the rapped tag as the “TRILLION DOLLA’ SURPLUS’D QUEEN” in poem/rap FUZZY MATH available at http://jphogan.org and where originally streamed and published via http://citizenrosebud.us.
President Clinton and Senate Banking chieftain Dodd are oddly remembered for having asked a small gaggle of banking heads to find a way to “gamble away” the known and/or expected risks inherent in Bill Clinton’s desire to be most popular by coyly burning our economic candle from both ends at once. You can call it “a ditch” or that “it burned out” as expected - seemingly.
It is absolutely not now funny that President Obama’s Obamacare ACA was fronted as not meant to cover illegal immigrants while now of he of an immigration proposal that would have them all by their conservative estimate of 12 million to be fully covered it seems as citizens by about the time his Obamacare however costed otherwise is to then be in effect on the promises and predictions about it as affordable without these 12 million covered as well.
Only the Clintons needed the Clintons’ SURPLUSES of them also to a finding of a thought impossible trillion in cuts. Without matching the GOP efforts of the balancing of our budget their scheming and effecting to line Hillary up would have been bust. These are the same Clintons who cut a trillion in liew of spending on immigration reforms as well.
The Clintons’ SURPLUSES did take away the pipeline of Federal Government spending that needed the 4-7 year headstart to have kept enough employment in our economy for the risky lending housing bubble as run yet as their unfunded Federal social program. The timing of such is nearly enough self evident now though hardly the political absolute it should rank with while incidentally chronological to a set up for economic collapse about 2006 or 2007. It is that to have seen the housing not collapse the “shovel ready” jobs had to not have been cut by the Clintons’s SURPLUSES during their second term so that they would have been already processed and in the works with all necessary permitting for the “economics” then needed after the Clintonomics of stirring a hyper-consumerism ran the length of its short wick.
It is that President Obama is the President now maybe most trapped by ABSOLUTES of his own orations. But that said it is absolutely a real concern that the Clintons were offered political protection like of a “WE’RE RIGHT - THEY’RE WRONG” polarizing political partisanship then quite only able to lead to gridlock. But with these shared it is important to really consider how absolutely correct I am in sharing that the Clintons were the only ones that needed the SURPLUSES and politically to save a succession scheming to line Hillary up for an inevitable anointing more as if a “queen.”
We have all long been paying too high a price for the SUPLUSES of the Clintons. And it is absolutely contradictory that the Clintons can be economically right for so much cutting, and that President Obama can yet be so right for wanting to spend so much once cut as unnecessary as if it is still necessary.
The Clintons’ SURPLUSES do deserve to go down in history as one of our greatest national economic blunders of the past century. President Clinton did know enough to know he shouldn’t have pursued surpluses and his risky lending programs with his Clintonomics of a pimped out hyper-consumerism — but resisting temptations (political) is historically of record a characteristic not as of a “strong suit.”
A while ago while being a partisan political operator against his promises to operate his CGI as non-partisan and non-political he in an interview with Maria Bartiromo proffered an “expertise” about economies needing time to recover science that by his own words and phraseology if actually an “expert”, and if such affirms he was an expert while President, did condemn himself as knowingly having been of doing what he knew he economically shouldn’t have done while President.
Beyond this we are of a 2013 as much needing a pop trending for key word relevance about “capitalism” and “socialism” still. We though need to find a way to break down the ABSOLUTES of and by President Obama to get to the realistic realm of “cost consciousness” - this is needed as we also need to really discuss tax reforms, and still immigration.